Ground-Motion Variability for Ruptures on Rough Faults

Author:

Vyas Jagdish Chandra1ORCID,Galis Martin23,Mai P. Martin1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 1King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

2. 2Department of Astronomy, Physics of the Earth, and Meteorology, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia

3. 3Earth Science Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia

Abstract

ABSTRACT Fault roughness influences earthquake rupture dynamics, seismic energy radiation, and, hence, resulting ground motion and its variability. Using 3D dynamic rupture simulations considering a range of rough-fault realizations, we investigate the effects of rupture complexity caused by fault roughness on ground-motion variability, that is, the variability of peak ground acceleration (PGA) and velocity (PGV) as a function of distance. In our analysis, we vary hypocenter locations (leading to unilateral and bilateral ruptures) and fault roughness amplitude to generate a set of magnitude M ≈ 7 strike-slip dynamic rupture simulations. Synthetic seismic waveforms computed on a dense set of surface sites (maximum resolved frequency 5.75 Hz) form our database for detailed statistical analyses. For unilateral ruptures, our simulations reveal that ground-shaking variability (in terms of PGA and PGV) remains nearly constant with increasing distance from the fault. In contrast, bilateral ruptures lead to slowly decreasing ground-motion variability with increasing distance in the near field (less than 20 km). The variability becomes almost constant at large fault distances. We also find that low-amplitude fault roughness leads to ruptures that are likely to generate higher PGA variability than events on faults with high-amplitude roughness. Increasing fault roughness distorts the radiation pattern, thereby reducing directivity effects and, hence, potentially lowering ground-motion variability. The average PGV variability from our rough-fault rupture models is consistent with estimates from empirical ground-motion models (GMMs). However, the average PGA variability exceeds the variability encoded in empirical GMMs by nearly 20%. Hence, our findings have implications for near-source ground-motion prediction in seismic hazard studies, because ground-motion variability depends on details of the earthquake rupture process and is larger than GMM estimates.

Publisher

Seismological Society of America (SSA)

Subject

Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics

Reference74 articles.

1. Summary of the Abrahamson & Silva NGA ground-motion relations;Abrahamson;Earthq. Spectra,2008

2. Summary of the ASK14 ground motion relation for active crustal regions;Abrahamson;Earthq. Spectra,2014

3. Effects of fault roughness on coseismic slip and earthquake locations;Allam;J. Geophys. Res.,2019

4. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis without the ergodic assumption;Anderson;Seismol. Res. Lett.,1999

5. A model for the shape of the Fourier amplitude spectrum of acceleration at high frequencies;Anderson;Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.,1984

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3