Imaging Left-Lateral and Reverse Near-Surface Slip of the 2020 Mw 5.1 Sparta, North Carolina, Earthquake

Author:

Szymanski Eric D.1ORCID,Hetland Eric A.1ORCID,Figueiredo Paula M.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 1Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.

2. 2Department of Marine, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, U.S.A.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Coseismic deformation of the 9 August 2020 Mw 5.1 Sparta, North Carolina, earthquake was captured by an Advanced Land Observing Satellite 2 interferogram, a Sentinel 1A/B interferogram, and differential light detection and ranging (lidar). Owing to the moderate surface deformation compared to the inherent uncertainties of interferometric data, the interferograms suffered from low signal-to-noise ratios, exacerbated by spurious signals arising from the discrepancy in resolution between the interferograms and digital elevation model used during processing. Nevertheless, coseismic slip can be imaged using graph-guided fused LASSO, where LASSO is the least-absolute shrinkage and selection operator—an inverse method that combines sparsity constraints and smoothness regularization—to infer signal from noisy and/or incomplete data. We develop five coseismic slip models, one determined only from the Sentinel 1A/B interferogram, one determined from both interferograms, one determined from all the Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) data masking potentially spurious data corresponding to industrial parks, one from lidar 3D displacements only, and one constrained by the masked InSAR and the lidar data. All five models are coseismic slip on a single fault plane, trending northwest–southeast with dips ranging from 41° to 60° to the southwest. Coseismic slip is imaged to be shallow, with predominantly oblique reverse slip extending to about 2 km depth. We find that masking the interferometric data corresponding to the industrial parks yields a coseismic slip model in better concordance with ancillary information about the Sparta earthquake and that the lidar data yield additional constraints on near-surface coseismic slip. We show that our preferred coseismic slip model is consistent with a stress regime that does not depart from an Andersonian thrust regime to a large degree, constraining that the background stress is larger than 20–30 MPa.

Publisher

Seismological Society of America (SSA)

Reference66 articles.

1. Method for registration of 3-D shapes. Sensor fusion IV: Control paradigms and data structures;Besl,1992

2. Harnessing the GPS data805 explosion for interdisciplinary science;Blewitt;Eos Trans. AGU,2018

3. Compressed sensing and its applications;Boche,2019

4. The Giles County, Virginia, seismic zone;Bollinger;Science,1983

5. Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes;Brune;J. Geophys. Res.,1970

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3