New Zealand Fault-Rupture Depth Model v.1.0: A Provisional Estimate of the Maximum Depth of Seismic Rupture on New Zealand’s Active Faults

Abstract

ABSTRACT We summarize estimates of the maximum rupture depth on New Zealand’s active faults (“New Zealand Fault-Rupture Depth Model v.1.0”), as used in the New Zealand Community Fault Model v1.0 and as a constraint for the latest revision of the New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model (NZ NSHM 2022). Rupture depth estimates are based on a combination of two separate model approaches (using different methods and datasets). The first approach uses regional seismicity distribution from a relocated earthquake catalog to calculate the 90% seismicity cutoff depth (D90), representing the seismogenic depth limit. This is multiplied by an overshoot factor representing the dynamic propagation of rupture into the conditional stability zone, and accounting for the difference between regional seismicity depths and the frictional properties of a mature fault zone to arrive at a seismic estimate of the maximum rupture depth. The second approach uses surface heat flow and rock type to compute depths that correspond to the thermal limits of frictional instabilities on seismogenic faults. To arrive at a thermally-based maximum rupture depth, these thermal limits are also multiplied by an overshoot factor. Both the models have depth cutoffs at the Moho and/or subducting slabs. Results indicate the maximum rupture depths between 8 (Taupō volcanic zone) and >30 km (e.g., southwest North Island), strongly correlated with regional thermal gradients. The depths derived from the two methods show broad agreement for most of the North Island and some differences in the South Island. A combined model using weighting based on relative uncertainties is derived and validated using constraints from hypocenter and slip model depths from recent well-instrumented earthquakes. We discuss modifications to the maximum rupture depths estimated here that were undertaken for application within the NZ NSHM 2022. Our research demonstrates the utility of combining seismicity cutoff and thermal stability estimates to assess the down-dip dimensions of future earthquake ruptures.