Comment on “An Evaluation of the Timing Accuracy of Global and Regional Seismic Stations and Networks” by Yang et al. (2021)

Author:

Zhang Xin1ORCID,Wen Lianxing2

Affiliation:

1. 1Laboratory of Seismology and Physics of Earth’s Interior; School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China

2. 2Department of Geosciences, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York, U.S.A.

Abstract

Abstract Yang et al. (2021; hereafter, YSR21) reported widespread clock errors at global and regional stations by measuring travel-time residuals of repeating earthquakes (doublets) after the corrections for relative event parameters and claimed that the reported temporal changes in the inner core boundary (ICB) in Wen (2006; hereafter, Wen06) were a “misidentification” after correcting the clock errors and instrumental changes of the seismic stations. Here, we examine their claims with a focus on the reported “problematic” stations AAK and OBN and the two associated doublets they emphasized in the inner core study. Forward calculations show that: (1) YSR21’s doublet relocation results contain large errors, generating large travel-time residuals in the individual stations and in the depth-sensitive phases, (2) YSR21’s selection of “problematic stations” is not supported by the travel-time residuals predicted from their relocation results, and (3) YSR21’s reported clock errors of the two stations are not reproducible based on their relocation results. Our reanalysis of the doublet data, which yields a much better fit to the observations, indicates no clock error at OBN and no justifiable claim of a clock error at AAK. Accordingly, YSR21’s manual shifts by clock errors to the OBN and AAK observations of Wen06 are not justified, and their resultant claim of “misidentification” of the temporal ICB change in Wen06 is unfounded. We further show that the effect of instrument changes can be simply corrected by the deconvolution of instrument responses, and the temporal change of PKiKP at station ARU in Wen06 is evident after the correction. Our study confirms the reported ICB temporal change in Wen06. The inaccurate relocation and unreproducible results in YSR21 raise questions on their claim of prevailing clock errors in the global stations and the validity of the past inner core studies by the two leading authors.

Publisher

Seismological Society of America (SSA)

Reference23 articles.

1. The computation of seismic travel times;Buland;Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.,1983

2. The TauP Toolkit: Flexible seismic travel-time and ray-path utilities;Crotwell;Seismol. Res. Lett.,1999

3. The IDA very long period and very broadband networks;Davis;Seismol. Res. Lett.,2023

4. Preliminary reference Earth model;Dziewonski;Phys. Earth. Planet. In.,1981

5. SAC2000: Signal processing and analysis tools for seismologists and engineers;Goldstein,2003

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3