Comparison of Near-Fault Displacement Interpretations from Field and Aerial Data for the M 6.5 and 7.1 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence Ruptures

Author:

Goulet Christine A.1ORCID,Wang Yongfei1ORCID,Nweke Chukwuebuka C.2,Tang Bo-xiang3,Wang Pengfei3,Hudson Kenneth S.3ORCID,Ahdi Sean K.4ORCID,Meng Xiaofeng1ORCID,Hudson Martin B.5,Donnellan Andrea6ORCID,Lyzenga Gregory A.6ORCID,Brandenberg Scott J.3ORCID,Stewart Jonathan P.3ORCID,Gallien Timu3ORCID,Winters Maria A.3

Affiliation:

1. Southern California Earthquake Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.

2. Sonny Astani Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.

3. Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.

4. Department of Earth, Planetary, & Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.

5. Turner Engineering Group, Turner Construction Company, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.

6. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, U.S.A.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Coseismic surface fault displacement presents a serious potential hazard for structures and for lifeline infrastructure. Distributed lifeline infrastructure tends to cover large distances and may cross faults in multiple locations, especially in active tectonic regions like California. However, fault displacement measurements for engineering applications are quite sparse, rendering the development of predictive models extremely difficult and fraught with large uncertainties. Detailed fault surface rupture mapping products exist for a few documented cases, but they may not capture the full width of ground deformations that are likely to impact distributed infrastructure. The 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence presented an ideal opportunity to collect data and evaluate the ability of different techniques to capture coseismic deformations on and near the fault ruptures. Both the M 6.5 and 7.1 events ruptured the surface in sparsely populated desert areas where little vegetation is present to obscure surficial features. Two study areas (~400 m × 500 m each) around the surface ruptures from the two events were selected. Teams of researchers were deployed and coordinated to gather data in three ways: field measurements and photographs, imagery from small uninhabited aerial systems, and imagery from airborne light detection and ranging. Each of these techniques requires different amounts of resources in terms of cost, labor, and time associated with the data collection, processing, and interpretation efforts. This article presents the data collection methods used for the two study areas, and qualitative and quantitative comparisons of the results interpretations. While all three techniques capture the key features that are important for displacement design of distributed infrastructure, the use of remote sensing methods in combination with field measurements presents an advantage over the use of any single technique.

Publisher

Seismological Society of America (SSA)

Subject

Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3