Determination of Local Magnitude for Earthquakes Recorded from the Texas Seismological Network (TexNet)

Author:

Kavoura Florentia1,Savvaidis Alexandros1,Rathje Ellen2

Affiliation:

1. Texas Seismological Network (TexNet), Bureau of Economic Geology, John A. and Katherine G. Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, U.S.A.

2. Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Cockrell School of Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, U.S.A.

Abstract

Abstract In this study, we present a local magnitude (ML) relation for the earthquakes recorded from the Texas Seismological Network (TexNet) between the dates of 1 January 2017 and 31 July 2019. Using a comprehensive seismic dataset from earthquakes in Texas, we propose a distance correction term −logA0, which is consistent with the original definition of the Richter magnitude. The proposed distance correction calculation for the TexNet events accounts for the attenuation characteristics of the direct and refracted waves over different distance ranges. Regression analysis of Wood–Anderson amplitudes results in the following trilinear function, which represents the attenuation attributes of the events under investigation: −logA0={2.07×log(Rhyp)+0.0002×(Rhyp−100)−0.72Rhyp≤16  km1.54×log(Rhyp)+0.0002×(Rhyp−100)−0.0816  km<Rhyp≤105  km,0.29×log(Rhyp)+0.0002×(Rhyp−100)+2.45Rhyp>105  km in which Rhyp is the hypocentral distance (km). The derived distance correction relationship results in an accurate ML relationship for Texas that is unbiased over a 200 km distance range. Compared with other ML relations, the proposed relation in this study gives lower ML values over all distances than those calculated by Richter (1958), Hutton and Boore (1987), Babaie Mahani and Kao (2019), and Quinones et al. (2019) by an average of 0.01, 0.12, 0.16, and 0.15 units, respectively; this study’s proposed relation gives higher ML values over all distances than those calculated by Scales et al. (2017), Yenier (2017), and Greig et al. (2018) by an average of 0.28, 0.01, and 0.08 units, respectively.

Publisher

Seismological Society of America (SSA)

Subject

Geophysics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3