Affiliation:
1. Professor of English Hindustan (Deemed to be) University Padur, Chennai, India
Abstract
Writing is an activity in which mind and body are simultaneously engaged; content and language correlate; a person and ‘an other’, as a representative of a community, coexist. If any one element in the pairs mentioned above turns dysfunctional, writing collapses. While in a second or foreign language, possibilities of such failures and mismatches are more. This paper explores the potentials of the activity theory as discussed at length in the Soviet psychology of the first half of the last century. The paper begins with an inquiry into how writing instruction in English as a second language (ESL) can be made more productive, and ends with a proposal of transforming the act of writing into an activity of composing, using the framework of activity theory.
Reference14 articles.
1. Chaiklin, S. (2019). The meaning and origin of the activity concept in Soviet psychology—with primary focus on A. N. Leontiev’s approach. Theory and Psychology. 29. 1.pp. 3-26.https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319828208
2. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Massachusetts MIT Press.
3. van Dijk, T.A. (1981). Episodes as Units of Discourse Analysis. In Deborah Tannen (ed.), Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press, pp. 177-195
4. Engestrom, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual social transformation. In .Y. Engestrom., R. Mictinen., and R.I. Ponamaki.(eds.).Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. pp.19 – 38.
5. Gergen, C. A.(1992). Review of Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses .by Gee, J. P. Ilha do Desterro 29, 1992 pp 139-146.