Abstract
Beyond offering guidelines for voting, Faithful Citizenship represents an attempt by the U.S. Catholic bishops to articulate a theological vision of political engagement. One may examine the theological vision of Faithful Citizenship according to three textual viewpoints: what it says (content); theological understandings (problematics); and possibilities for conceptual development (implications). Addressing the dynamics of political engagement in contemporary society is a complex task. While this analysis maintains that Faithful Citizenship constitutes a useful conceptual resource insofar as signaling the basic theological terms of Catholic political engagement, there are areas of conceptual underdevelopment. Accordingly, the analysis suggests paths toward a deeper conceptual engagement with political philosophy, especially understandings of constitutional democracy.
Publisher
Center for Study of Religion and Religious Tolerance
Reference53 articles.
1. Alpers Christiane, “Public Opposition to Ecclesial Involvement in Secular Politics: Schillebeeckx’s Grace-Optimism as a Response to Public Theology and Radical Orthodoxy”, in: Salvation in the World: The Crossroads of Public Theology, Stephan van Erp, Christopher Cimorelli, and Christiane Alpers (eds.), T&T Clark, New York, 2017.
2. Anderson Owen, The Declaration of Independence and God, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017.
3. Antkowiak Laura S., Levi G. Allen, and Geoffrey C. Layman, Coping with Cross-Pressures: The Seamless Garment in Catholic Political Behavior, Political Psychology, Vol. 42, No. 1, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12796
4. Barak Aharon, Human Dignity: The Constitutional Value and the Constitutional Right, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015.
5. Baynes Kenneth, The Normative Grounds of Social Criticism: Kant, Rawls, Habermas, SUNY Press, Albany, 1992.