PRESCRIPTIVE AUTHORITY FOR CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGISTS: A REVIEW OF THE DEBATE

Author:

Cox David E.,Ellis Jon B.

Abstract

This review of current discourse and research on the granting of prescriptive authority to clinical psychologists indicates that the mental health profession is divided into two distinct perspectives regarding this issue. Both perspectives were examined along with pertinent evidence as provided in the available discourse and research. These authors concluded that while each perspective offers varying levels of applicability, the empirical evidence supports the efficacy of granting prescriptive authority to clinical psychologists. The client stands to benefit from this proposal in three ways: improved efficiency of treatment, better possibility of insurance coverage and reduced incidence of overmedication that may be associated with the medical orientation of those currently holding prescriptive authority.

Publisher

Scientific Journal Publishers Ltd

Subject

Social Psychology

Reference18 articles.

1. American Psychological Association. (1993). Psychologists' Code of Ethics.

2. Prescription privileges for psychologists: A survey of predoctoral interns and directors of training.

3. Carlson, N. R. (1999). Foundations of Physiological Psychology (4thed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

4. A training model for psychologists with prescription privileges: Clinical pharmacopsychologists.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3