Abstract
Purpose. The military aggression of the russian federation against Ukraine led to the disruption of logistics processes and the destruction of the production capacity of the agribusiness. This study aims to describe an accounting toolkit to determine and evaluate the direct losses of agricultural enterprises due to the war.
Methodology / approach. This study is based on the use of Ukrainian regulatory documents. The authors of this study applied synthesis methods when summarizing information on estimates of war damage. They used analytical methods in monitoring the world and national experience of such assessment. The cost method was used during the approbation. It provided for the use of the estimate program “Building technologies: Estimate 8”. Determining the volumes of repair and construction works was carried out in accordance with the State Construction Standards and Resource Elemental Estimate Standards of Ukraine. In addition, modelling, analogy and comparison methods were also used.
Results. In this study, the authors proposed a simple algorithm of actions, which allows for detecting direct damage by enterprises in a short time. The algorithm is based on the use of five accounting methods: (1) Inventory method, (2) Documentation method, (3) Evaluation method, (4) Accounts and balance method, (5) Reporting method. The specifics of the application of each method are described in detail, taking into account the requirements of accounting legislation for the recognition and assessment, and inventory of assets of agribusiness enterprises. Experimental calculations (using the example of damage to real estate as a result of hostilities) allowed us to conclude that the damage calculated by the individual (object-by-object) approach (USD 63.88 billion) is 30 % higher than the quick estimate of the World Bank (USD 50.4 billion) and 20 % higher than expert estimates made in Ukraine (USD 50.4 billion).
Originality / scientific novelty. According to the research results, a methodical algorithm to estimate direct war losses for Ukrainian agribusiness enterprises based on accounting methods has been proposed. Using accounting tools to evaluate the direct losses is essential for the following reason. Let’s suppose that the accounting system does not confirm the data on direct losses. In this case, misunderstandings may arise between the participants of socio-economic relations, who operate with general (forecasted) figures. At the same time, verified accounting data on direct losses can be evidence in court and are the basis for receiving compensation or financial assistance.
Practical value / implications. The practical significance of the proposed methodical algorithm lies in the ability to systematically recognize and assess direct losses of agribusiness enterprises, taking into account the specifics of their assets, based on the accountant's professional judgment, without the involvement of outside experts.
Publisher
Institute of Eastern European Research and Consulting
Subject
Marketing,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference33 articles.
1. Yuhas, A. (2022). Thousands of Civilian Deaths and 6.6 Million Refugees: Calculating the Costs of War. The New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/24/world/europe/russia-ukraine-war-toll.html.
2. Mitri, G., Nader, M., Van der Molen, I., & Lovett, J. (2014). Evaluating exposure to land degradation in association with repetitive armed conflicts in North Lebanon using multi-temporal satellite data. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 186(11), 7655–7672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-3957-5.
3. CEOBS (2020). How does war damage the environment? Available at: https://ceobs.org/how-does-war-damage-the-environment.
4. Vygovska, N. G., & Polchanov, A. Y. (2019). Estimation of the losses of the Ukraine’s financial potential from military conflict. Accounting and Finance, 4(86), 70–77. https://doi.org/10.33146/2307-9878-2019-4(86)-70-77.
5. Sokil, O., Zhuk, V., Holub, N., & Levchenko, O. (2019). Accounting and analytical methods for identifying risks of agricultural enterprises’ sustainable development. In V. Nadykto (Ed.), Modern development paths of agricultural production: trends and innovations, (pp. 561–569). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14918-5_55.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献