Abstract
Abstract
David Foster Wallace and Bret Easton Ellis are known for their contributions to postmodern literature; however, they also developed a contentious relationship outside of their literary works. But what caused this conflict between the two writers? Although they were often in competition with one another as literary contemporaries who both explored postmodernism, the real issue between the two writers is the difference in how they envisioned and portrayed a postmodern world. While both Wallace and Ellis utilize irony, examine collectivist identities, and critique equality in the West, they do so with a different endgame in mind—namely, Wallace’s idea that the postmodern world encourages a deeper look into notions of selfhood that extend beyond Ellis’s cynical emphasis on surface and superficiality. A comparative approach of “Girl With Curious Hair” (1989) and American Psycho (1991) offers fresh perspectives on how Wallace and Ellis utilized similar themes to contrast their different points of view regarding the postmodern world. (SSL)
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Philosophy,Visual Arts and Performing Arts,History
Reference33 articles.
1. Allué, Sonia Baelo. “The Aesthetics of Serial Killing: Working Against Ethics in The Silence of the Lambs and American Psycho.” Atlantis 24.2 (2002): 7–24. Print.
2. Bewes, Timothy. “What is ‘Philosophical Honesty’ in Postmodern Literature?” New Literary History 31.3 (2000): 421–34. Print.
3. Boswell, Marshall. Understanding David Foster Wallace. Columbia: U of South Carolina P, 2020. Print.
4. Burn, Stephen J., ed. Conversations with David Foster Wallace. Jackson: UP of Mississippi, 2012. Print
5. Clark, Robert C. “A Reverence for Untrendy Human Troubles: David Foster Wallace’s ‘Good People,’ Ernest Hemingway’s ‘Hills Like White Elephants,’ and American Minimalist Narration.” Amerikastudien/American Studies 62.3 (2017): 397–412. Print.