Problematic Analysis of Assessment Standards in Physical Education

Author:

Arisetya Purwadi DindaORCID,Nanda Hanief YulinggaORCID,Erdilanita Ulma

Abstract

Improving the quality of the assessment is needed because with an assessment process that meets the standards, student learning outcomes will be measured accurately. This article aims to analyze several studies on the problem of assessment standards in the physical education (PE) learning process so that knowing what factors have a relationship and influence on the occurrence of problems in physical education assessment standards and solutions that can be implemented in these problems. The method in this article is a literature review using flow chart PRISMA to identify articles through process filtering and data extraction. The results were obtained from 15 articles that meet the criteria, such as the subjects used are teachers and students in educational institutions and articles used in at least the last ten years. A total of 15 articles stated that the assessment process in physical education learning still needs a lot to meet the educational assessment standards. This is due to a lack of understanding of performance appraisal because teachers usually only see and use pre-existing assessments without evaluation and need to be adjusted to the character of student achievement and teachers' critical thinking without pedagogy.

Publisher

Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Reference40 articles.

1. Aji, B. S., & Winarno, M. E. (2016). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Pengetahuan Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani Olahraga dan Kesehatan (PJOK) Kelas VIII Semester Gasal. April 2015, 21–22.

2. Annerstedt, C. (2010). ‘ I have My Own Picture of what the Demands are . . . ’: Grading in Swedish PEH – Problems of Validity , Comparability and Fairness. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X10381299

3. Apthorp, H. S., D’Amato, E. D., & Richardson, A. (2022). Effective Standards-Basedpractices for Native Americanstudents: A Review of Research Literature.

4. Boonsem, A., & Chaoensupmanee, T. (2020). Determining the Factors of Teaching Effectiveness for Physical Education. 13(3), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v13n3p43

5. Brennan, R. L. (1992). Generalizability Theory. 27–35.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3