Selecting tools to enhance scholarly communication through the life cycle of scientific research

Author:

Kuzminska OlenaORCID

Abstract

Education and science digitalization belongs to the priority areas of information society development. However, we can observe that while Ukraine enters the European educational and scientific space, Ukrainian scientists cannot yet efficiently compete in the international labor market. One of the reasons behind this is that Ukrainian scientists and researchers are not fully integrated into the world system of digital scholarly communication. To help researchers use digital tools supporting scholarly communication, many companies carry out various educational events to support open science and initiate international research and projects. Under modern conditions the digitalization of scientific communication went to the front-burner due to the COVID-19 pandemic. At the same time, the forced transition to digital scholarly communications through the COVID-19 pandemic can help integrate young scientists into the international scientific space. This article provides an analysis of tools to support scholarly communication developed within the "101 Innovations in Scholarly Communication" project. The international survey demonstrates the tools that scientists prefer to use at each stage of the research. This paper characterizes the advantages of particular tools on different stages of scientific research process induced by the current tendency for scholarly communication digitalization. During the work, we outlined the scope for future research and found it necessary to conduct an additional survey for the scholarly community.

Publisher

Academy of Cognitive and Natural Sciences

Reference26 articles.

1. 101 Innovations, 2016. Academic social networks – the Swiss Army Knives of scholarly communication. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/3kzhhvfj.

2. Bezjak, S., Clyburne-Sherin, A., Conzett, P., Fernandes, P., Görögh, E., Helbig, K., Kramer, B., Labastida, I., Niemeyer, K., Psomopoulos, F., Ross-Hellauer, T., Schneider, R., Tennant, J., Verbakel, E., Brinken, H. and Heller, L., 2018. The Open Science Training Handbook. Available from: https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/content/open-science-training-handbook.

3. Bielikov, O., 2020. Scientific communication as a component of pedagogical science. Bulletin of the Cherkasy Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University. Series “Pedagogical Sciences”, (1). Available from: https://ped-ejournal.cdu.edu.ua/article/view/36-41.

4. Bronnikova, L.V., 2015. Communication in science: New tools for the production of knowledge. Naukovi pratsi. Filosofiia, 257(245), pp.38–42.

5. Brünger-Weilandt, S., 2007. E-science - advancing new ways of scientific communication. Information Services & Use, 27(4), pp.161–166. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-2007-27406.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3