Comparison of pain assessments made by patients and nurses in emergency services

Author:

Sucu Çakmak Nefise CevriyeORCID,Çalışkan NurcanORCID

Abstract

Aim: This research aimed to compare pain assessments made by patients and by nurses. Method: This descriptive and comparative research was conducted in a state, a university and a private hospital emergency service monitoring unit that had the highest number of patient admissions in Ankara, Turkey. The research sample consisted of 175 patients and 35 nurses. For the collection of data, the following sources were consulted: the patient information form, the nurse information form and the McGill Pain Questionnaire. For evaluation of the data, number and percentage calculations, chi-square analysis, kappa compliance analysis and the Wilcoxon sign test were used. Written consent was received from the ethical council and hospitals as well as from nurses and patients. Results: 74.3% of nurses stated that they do not think that the pain level expressed by the patient is always right. While the point average given by patients related to all dimensions define the characteristics of pain was 20.48 ± 10.10, the average given by nurses was 14.35 ± 8.46. There is a statistically significant difference between the point averages given by patients and nurses related to total dimensions of pain characteristics (p<0.05). Conclusion: As a result, pain evaluations of nurses were found to be significantly lower than those of patients. It is suggested that the policies and procedures used in health personnel education institutes and health institutes related to pain management should be improved.

Publisher

Uluslararasi Insan Bilimleri Dergisi

Subject

General Medicine

Reference48 articles.

1. Abdalrahim, M. S., Majali, S. A., & Bergbom, I. (2008). Documentation of postoperative pain by nurses in surgical wards. Acute pain, 10(2), 73-81.

2. Akın, S., & Durna, Z. (2013). A comparative descriptive study examining the perceptions of cancer patients, family caregivers, and nurses on patient symptom severity in Turkey. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 17(1), 30–37.

3. Ay, F., & Ecevit, A.Ş. (2010). Post operatif ağrı ve hemşirelik uygulamaları. [Postoperative pain and nursing practices]. Pain,22(1), 21–29.

4. Bağtatlı-Aydın, H. & Eşer İ. (2010). Hemşirelerin ve kanserli hastaların ağrı değerlendirmelerinin karşılaştırılması [Comparison of pain evaluations of nurses and cancer patients]. Ege University Journal of Nursing High School, 26(1), 11–23.

5. Bergman, C. L. (2012). Emergency nurses’ perceived barriers to demonstrating caring when managing adult patients’ pain. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 38(3), 218–225.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3