Abstract
Background: Planted forests face on-going challenges to increase productivity while remaining within sustainable limits. Forest management activities that potentially impact on water quality are under increasing public scrutiny and regulatory controls. New Zealand’s forest industry is experimenting with aerially applied, mid-rotation fertiliser treatments as a sustainable option to increase productivity from planted forests. However, the effect of such applications on water quality requires investigation.
Methods: Field trials were established to assess the effects of two conventional fertiliser applications (either granular di-ammonium phosphate (DAP) or granular urea) and a new-to-forestry liquid foliar fertiliser blend, on nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations in stream water of three planted forest sites representing a range of New Zealand climatic and soil environments.
Results: Overall, the liquid foliar fertiliser treatment had the least impact on water quality compared with the two conventional fertiliser treatments. On the day of fertiliser application, when compared with pre-treatment in-stream concentrations, the urea treatments resulted in short-term increases in total nitrogen. The DAP treatment increased total phosphorus and dissolved reactive phosphorus concentrations with peak concentrations declining within hours. In the post-application period, any increases in nutrient concentrations in stream water were mainly associated with rainfall events within six months of application and at one site, the resumption of stream flow following a dry spell. Riparian ‘no-spray’ buffers of varying widths assisted in mediating the impacts of fertiliser applications.
Conclusions: Initial evidence from these trials indicates that mid-rotation fertiliser treatments have the potential to provide an alternate management option to increase forest productivity or disease resilience with minimal or only short-term effects to water quality. However, further research on their environmental effects would support the development of guidelines specific to mid-rotation fertiliser applications, particularly if mid-rotation fertiliser applications become standard management practice in the forest industry.
Reference41 articles.
1. Albaugh, T.J., Lee Allen, H., & Fox, T.R. (2007). Historical patterns of forest fertilization in the southeastern United States from 1969 to 2004. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 31, 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1093/sjaf/31.3.129
2. Anderson, C.W. (2002). Ecological effects on streams from forest fertilization-literature review and conceptual framework for future study in the western Cascades. [Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4047], 56 p. Portland, Oregon, USA: U.S. Geological Survey. https://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/2001/4047/wri01-4047.pdf
3. Baillie, B.R., Evanson, A.W., Unsworth, D., & Jeram, S. (2017). Aerial application of copper for dothistroma control in New Zealand's planted forests-effect on stream environments. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 24(31), 24494-24508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0020-4
4. Baillie, B.R., Neary, D.G., Gous, S., & Rolando, C.A. (2015). Aquatic fate of aerially applied hexazinone and terbuthylazine in a New Zealand planted forest. Journal of Sustainable Watershed Science & Management, 2, 118-129. https://doi.org/10.5147/jswsm.v2i1.144
5. Beltran, B.J., Amatya, D.M., Youssef, M., Jones, M., Callahan, T.J., Skaggs, R.W., & Nettles, J.E. (2010). Impacts of fertilization on water quality of a drained pine plantation: A worst case scenario. Journal of Environmental Quality, 39, 293-303. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2008.0506