Author:
Kumar Nuthalapaty Syama,Gangula Chandra Sekhar,Badavath Praveen Kumar Naik,Kallam Deepthi,M V Bhimeswar
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare rocuronium to succinylcholine in adult patients undergoing elective surgery using two different doses of 0.6 mg/kg and 0.9 mg/kg for rapid sequence endotracheal intubation.
Methodology: Total of 90 cases were randomly divided into three groups of 30 in each. Group S was intubated with 1.5 mg/kg body weight succinylcholine chloride, group R1 intubated with 0.6 mg/kg body weight rocuronium bromide, and group R2 was intubated with 0.9 mg/kg body weight rocuronium bromide.
Results: 90% in group S, 53.33% in group R1, and 76.67% in group R2 cases had excellent intubating conditions. The onset time of group S was significantly shorter than that of group R2 and group R1 doses. There was statistical significance difference observed among group S, group R1, and group R2 regarding clinical onset of action (45.58±4.198, 56.38±5.032, and 52.59±3.966 seconds). Group S, group R1, and group R2 had mean duration of action of 5.24±1.453, 23.96±2.14, and 43.18±2.12 minutes respectively. In group R1 and group R2, the mean heart rates were increased by 47.1% and 33.9%, and mean arterial pressure increased by 28.56% and 24.92% observed one min after intubation, and returned to preinduction levels after 5 minutes. In all three groups, no significant side effects were observed.
Conclusion: Rocuronium at 0.9 mg/kg dose is preferable and alternative to succinylcholine in cases where succinylcholine is contraindicated
Publisher
Interdisciplinar Academy of Pain Medicine
Subject
Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Fuel Technology
Reference35 articles.
1. Kumar R, Kumari R, Kumar A. Rocuronium versus succinylcholine: a clinical comparison of two muscle relaxants for rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia. International Journal of Advances in Medicine [Internet]. 2016;596–601. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20162501
2. Savarese JJ. The Autonomic Margins of Safety of Metocurine and d-Tubocurarine in the Cat. Anesthesiology [Internet]. 1979 Jan 1;50(1):40–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-197901000-00009
3. Andrews JI, Kumar N, Van Den Brom RHG, Olkkola KT, Roest GJ, Wright PMC. A large simple randomized trial of rocuronium versus succinylcholine in rapid-sequence induction of anaesthesia along with propofol. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica [Internet]. 1999 Jan;43(1):4–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-6576.1999.430102.x
4. Misra MN, Agarwal M, Pandey RP, Gupta A. A comparative study of rocuronium, vecuronium and succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth [Internet]. 2005;49(6):469-73. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/ijaweb/Abstract/2005/49060/A_COMPARATIVE_STUDY_OF_ROCURONIUM,_VECURONIUM_ AND.4.aspx
5. Shukla A, Dubey KP, Sharma MSN. Comparative evaluation of haemodynamic effects and intubatingconditions after administration of org 9426 (rocuronium) and succinylcholine. Indian J Anaesth 2004;48(6):476-9.