Affiliation:
1. COGITO Epistemology Research Centre, University of Glasgow, 67–69 Oakfield Avenue, Glasgow G3 8LP UK timothy.kearl@glasgow.ac.uk
2. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, 1 Grand Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407–0329 rhwallac@calpoly.edu
Abstract
Abstract
In this paper, we consider recent attempts to metaphysically explain agentive modality in terms of conditionals. We suggest that the best recent accounts face counterexamples, and more worryingly, they take some agentive modality for granted. In particular, the ability to perform basic actions features as a primitive in these theories. While it is perfectly acceptable for a semantics of agentive modal claims to take some modality for granted in getting the extension of action claims correct, a metaphysical explanation of agentive modality cannot, at least not in the way that conditional approaches to agentive modality do. We argue that this problem was present even in the classical conditional analysis. By a pessimistic induction, we suggest that, probably, no conditional approach to agentive modality will succeed.
Publisher
University of Illinois Press
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献