Value Alignment for Advanced Artificial Judicial Intelligence

Author:

Winter Christoph1,Hollman Nicholas2,Manheim David3

Affiliation:

1. Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México Mexico City, Mexico / Harvard University Cambridge, MA, USA Christoph_winter@fas.harvard.edu

2. Legal Priorities Project Cambridge, MA, USA

3. Israel Institute of Technology Haifa, Israel / Foresight Institute San Francisco, CA, USA

Abstract

AbstractThis paper considers challenges resulting from the use of advanced artificial judicial intelligence (AAJI). We argue that these challenges should be considered through the lens of value alignment. Instead of discussing why specific goals and values, such as fairness and nondiscrimination, ought to be implemented, we consider the question of how AAJI can be aligned with goals and values more generally, in order to be reliably integrated into legal and judicial systems. This value alignment framing draws on AI safety and alignment literature to introduce two otherwise neglected considerations for AAJI safety: specification and assurance. We outline diverse research directions and suggest the adoption of assurance and specification mechanisms as the use of AI in the judiciary progresses. While we focus on specification and assurance to illustrate the value of the AI safety and alignment literature, we encourage researchers in law and philosophy to consider what other lessons may be drawn.

Publisher

University of Illinois Press

Subject

Philosophy

Reference137 articles.

1. The Path of the Law: Towards Legal Singularity,;Alarie;University of Toronto Law Journal,2016

2. Constitutional Law in the Age of Balancing,;Aleinikoff;Yale Law Journal,1987

3. Amodei, Dario , and JackClark. 2016. “Faulty Reward Functions in the Wild,” OpenAI, December21. http://openai.com/blog/faulty-reward-functions/.

4. Amodei, Dario , ChrisOlah, JacobSteinhardt, PaulChristiano, JohnSchulman, and DanMané. 2016. “Concrete Problems in AI Safety.” (unpublished manuscript, July 25). http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.06565.

5. “Artificial Intelligence Incident Database.” 2022. Partnership on AI. http://incidentdatabase.ai/.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Incorporation of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the Field of Education;Advances in Human and Social Aspects of Technology;2023-10-16

2. Re-Evaluating GPT-4's Bar Exam Performance;SSRN Electronic Journal;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3