On Relativizing the Sensitivity Condition to Belief-Formation Methods

Author:

Zhao Bin1

Affiliation:

1. Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Institute of Foreign Philosophy, Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Peking University, 5 Yiheyuan Rd, Haidian District, Beijing 100871, China zhaobin@pku.edu.cn

Abstract

Abstract According to the sensitivity account of knowledge, S knows that p only if S's belief in p is sensitive in the sense that S would not believe that p if p were false. It is widely accepted that the sensitivity condition should be relativized to belief-formation methods to avoid putative counterexamples. A remaining issue for the account is how belief-formation methods should be individuated. In this paper, I argue that while a coarse-grained individuation is still susceptible to counterexamples, a fine-grained individuation makes the target belief trivially insensitive. Therefore, there is no principled way of individuating belief-formation methods that helps the sensitivity account to accommodate different cases.

Publisher

University of Illinois Press

Reference73 articles.

1. Towards Closure on Closure;Adams;Synthese,2012

2. Resurrecting the Tracking Theories;Adams;Australasian Journal of Philosophy,2005

3. Sensitivity Theory and the Individuation of Belief-Formation Methods;Alfano;Erkenntnis,2009

4. Nozick's Defense of Closure;Baumann,2012

5. Reliabilism and Safety;Becker;Metaphilosophy,2006

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3