Historical, Methodological, and Philosophical Analysis of the Working Memory Construct

Author:

Byrnes James P.1,Miller-Cotto Dana2

Affiliation:

1. Temple University

2. Kent State University

Abstract

Abstract The authors discuss the continued viability of the working memory construct by examining its origin and historical development in the field of psychology and critiquing it on theoretical, philosophical, and methodological grounds. They do so by asking and answering the following questions: (a) When and why did the construct first emerge in psychological theorizing?, (b) What are the historical trends in how has it been defined operationally?, (c) How have researchers related it to the construct of intelligence at different points in time?, (d) Is it a natural kind or a cultural invention?, (e) Is progress being made in understanding the construct?, and (f) Where do we go from here? They conclude that there are sufficient reasons for continuing to examine the construct given its considerable predictive value and suggest that the most promising approach would be to delve further into its association with fluid intelligence by using several kinds of methods.

Publisher

University of Illinois Press

Subject

Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Reference76 articles.

1. Working memory and intelligence: The same or different constructs?;Ackerman;Psychological Bulletin,2005

2. Theories of working memory: Differences in definition, degree of modularity, role of attention, and purpose;Adams;Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools,2018

3. The neurobiology of thought: The groundbreaking discoveries of Patricia Goldman-Rakic 1937–2003;Arnsten;Cerebral Cortex,2013

4. Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes;Atkinson,1968

5. The phonological loop as a language learning device;Baddeley;Psychological Review,1998

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3