Affiliation:
1. State University of New York College at Brockport
Abstract
Abstract
An everyday aesthetics, in contrast to conventional views rooted in the fine arts, is initiated by mundane objects, such as matching a tie to a suit, and ordinary settings, like the arrangement of walkways and stores in a mall. Largely neglected by an everyday aesthetics, though, are inexpensive paintings popular with the general public, such as mass-produced works produced overseas by teams of anonymous artists. “Assembly line” paintings, despite numerous critical objections, expand the boundaries of aesthetics and their focus on masterpieces. That claim rests on studies of mass-produced paintings, summarized here, that illustrate the differences as well as the parallels between a conventional and an everyday aesthetics. The latter, as illustrated by mass-produced paintings, takes into account the relationship of colors within a canvas to those in the room in which a work hangs (rugs, furniture, walls). A conventional aesthetics, at least in Western traditions of art, emphasizes solely the colors within a painting’s frame. Aesthetics is therefore not some rare and esoteric phenomenon whose primary source lies within a narrow number of paintings in relatively inaccessible places and endorsed (if not enforced) by experts.
Publisher
University of Illinois Press
Reference33 articles.
1. 1. An everyday aesthetics also applies to television, music, and the other popular arts. The everyday aesthetics of popular literature, for example, emphasizes realistic, concrete, and heroic characters who solve problems.
2. Berleant, A. (2014). Transformations in art and aesthetics. In L. Yuedi, & C. L. Carter (Eds.), Aesthetics of everyday life: East and West (pp. 2–12). Newcastle upon Tyne, England: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
3. Binkley, S. (2000). Kitsch as a repetitive system: A problem for the theory of taste hierarchy. Journal of Material Culture, 5(2), 131–151.
4. Cupchik, G. C. (2002). The evolution of psychical distance as an aesthetic concept. Culture and Psychology, 8(2), 155–188.
5. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York, NY: Putnam.