The Animacy of Stone: A Whiteheadian Perspective

Author:

Govaerts Brecht

Abstract

Abstract This article undertakes a critical analysis of the adoption of process metaphysics in the field of archaeology and anthropology for the explanation of animism. The field of “new animism” has adopted process metaphysics in order to counter the nineteenth-century definition of animism as epistemological projection toward animism as ontological condition. This shift from epistemology to ontology has the danger of equating animism with process metaphysics as such. By examining the category of propositional judgment within Whitehead’s metaphysics, I argue that the condition of animism emerges through a judgment of truth, which is aesthetic. It is through Whitehead’s integration of propositional judgment within his metaphysical system that one can understand that an ontological approach toward animism is not necessarily opposed to a reflective type of experience.

Publisher

University of Illinois Press

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science

Reference36 articles.

1. 1. The adoption of process metaphysics (via Gilles Deleuze and Alfred North Whitehead) in archaeology and anthropology is not limited to animism, but is concerned with a broader interest in interpreting prehistoric and tribal metaphysics. For the adoption of Deleuzian metaphysics, consider, for example: Conneller 13, 19; Fowler 25-26; Ingold 160; Harris and Cipolla 140; Viveiros de Castro 287. For the adoption of Whiteheadian metaphysics, consider, for example: Conneller 10-11; Gosden and Malafouris; Lucas 187; Olsen 119-120.

2. Alberti, Benjamin. “Archaeologies of Ontology.” Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 45, 2016, pp. 163-179.

3. Alberti, Benjamin, and Tamara Bray. “Animating Archaeology: Of Subjects, Objects, and Alternative Ontologies.” Cambridge Archaeological Journal, vol. 19, no. 3, 2009, pp. 337-343.

4. Alberti, Benjamin, and Yvonne Marshall. “Animating Archaeology: Local Theories and Conceptually Open-Ended Methodologies.” Cambridge Archaeological Journal, vol. 19, no. 3, 2009, pp. 344-356.

5. Alberti, Benjamin, et al. “‘Worlds Otherwise’: Archaeology, Anthropology, and Ontological Difference.” Current Anthropology, vol. 52, no. 6, 2011, pp. 896-912.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3