“Fault lines” and substitution in the family network: Three-generational, bi-lateral and gendered contact patterns in divorced and non-divorced families

Author:

de Bel VeraORCID,Potarca Gina,van Duijn Marijtje

Abstract

Objectives. Although the consequences of parental divorce for specific family relationships are increasingly studied, it remains unexplored how parental divorce reverberates through the larger family network, impacting not only the relationships with and between parents and their children, but also with grandparents. This study aims to unravel how three-generational, bi-lateral contact patterns manifest in the larger family network and how they differ when families experienced parental divorce. Methods. 4,436 families from the multi-actor Divorce in Flanders data with 1-5 family members (one child, father, mother, and paternal and maternal grandparents) reporting on contact with 1-7 family members are analyzed using a Social Relations Model. Results. Results show that parents have less frequent contact with their parents-in-law than with their own parents, indicating a clear fault line, which is deeper in divorced families. Mothers – compared to fathers – have more contact with their own parents, but fathers – compared to mothers – do not have more contact with their in-laws. Divorced fathers have more frequent contact with their own parents compared to non-divorced fathers. Less frequent contact with paternal (maternal) grandparents co-exists with more frequent contact with maternal (paternal) grandparents, indicating substitution, which is not stronger in divorced families. Discussion. The network approach enabled uncovering resilient strategies, i.e., substitution, in families experiencing an imbalance in paternal and maternal grandparental contact. The results emphasized the significant role of grandparents following divorce, particularly in the case of fathers, who appear to place greater reliance on maintaining contact with their parents after divorce.

Publisher

Center for Open Science

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3