Rights and Deaths: Government Reactions to the Pandemic

Author:

Cheibub Jose Antonio,Hong Ji Yeong Jean,Przeworski AdamORCID

Abstract

Democracies reacted slower than autocracies to the specter of the pandemic, and the most solidly democratic among them were particularly slow to react. We examine at which stages of the spread of the Covid governments introduced four measures that to varying degree abrogate liberal rights: school closings, bans on public meetings, compulsory lockdowns, and shutting work. We conclude that where rights are entrenched, encroaching on them is difficult. Yet we are struck that when the threat of death became sufficiently severe, many democracies resorted to the same measures as autocracies. Still, the reactions of democracies were highly heterogenous and we are unable to account for this heterogeneity.

Publisher

Center for Open Science

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Introduction;The Politics of the Pandemic in Eastern Europe and Eurasia;2023-07-24

2. The impact of COVID‐19 shelter‐in‐place policy responses on excess mortality;Health Economics;2023-07-18

3. Impact of the Pandemic on Damaging the Democratic Process in a Hybrid Regime in Georgia;Przegląd Politologiczny;2023-04-20

4. How populists fuel polarization and fail their response to COVID-19: An empirical analysis;Frontiers in Political Science;2022-08-25

5. Matices del entorno pandémico: Covidianidad, polarización y vulnerabilidad social;Revista del CESLA: International Latin American Studies Review;2022-06-30

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3