Before Asking “What Happens Next?”: The Compatibility Between the Olympic Education Principles and The Objectives of Sport for Development and Peace

Author:

Otay Yeliz1ORCID,Yılmaz Semih1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. MARMARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ

Abstract

The United Nations Office on Sport for Development and Peace has been closed in 2017 and its mission has been conveyed to the International Olympic Committee. The aim of this article is therefore to explore whether the principles of Olympic Education, based on Olympism and the Olympic Movement, are compatible with the objectives of Sport for Development and Peace. Qualitative research method was used in this research. And phenomenological research design was adapted as an instructive method for collecting and analyzing data. In-depth, semi-structured, face-to-face interviews were conducted with 6 participants whom were selected through purposive sampling based on their expertise on the topics of the research question. The resulting data was compiled using descriptive analysis and classified using content analysis. According to 11 main themes and 2 sub-themes that have been deducted, it has been revealed that Olympic Education principles and Sport for Development and Peace objectives complement each other in terms of conceptual basis and practice. On the basis of the research findings, the following conclusions were drawn: The participants of the Sport for Development and Peace programmes need to take active roles in the process; the policy resolutions upon the research subjects need to be implemented fully and effectively; the stakeholders in the Olympic Education and Sport for Development and Peace processes need to be all in cooperation and coordination; the sustainability of the process needs to be maintained; the strategic partnership between the United Nations and the International Olympic Committee needs to be maintained on an equal footing.

Publisher

Avrasya Spor Bilimleri ve Egitim Dergisi

Reference74 articles.

1. Abreu, N. (2002). Olympic multiculturalism: proclaimed universal values versus cultural relativism. In Olympic Studies Current Intellectual Crossroads (pp. 201-254).

2. Açıkgöz, S., Haudenhuyse, R., & Tınaz, C. (2021). Social innovation and challenges in youth-based sport practices: An analysis of state-led programs. In A. Tjønndal (Ed.), Social innovation in sport (pp.113-132). Palgrave McMillan.

3. Appleton, C. (2011). 'Critical Friends', Feminism and Integrity: A reflection on the use of critical friends as a research tool to support researcher integrity and reflexivity in qualitative research studies. Women in Welfare Education, 10.

4. Atalay, M. (2004). Uluslararası Olimpik Akademide (IOA) görev alan çeşitli ülke temsilcilerinin, dünyada Olimpizm düşüncesinin yaygınlaştırılmasına yönelik görüşlerinin analizi ve Türkiye için bir değerlendirme [Doctoral dissertation]. Marmara University (Türkiye).

5. Barclay, C. (2019, August 23). Just for fun. AMUN. https://www.amun.org/sports-as-a-tool-for-peace/.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3