CRITICAL ANIMAL STUDIES AND NON-SPECIESIST PERCEPTION OF ANIMALS IN THOMAS HARDY'S POETRY

Author:

Bulut Sarıkaya Dilek1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. KAPADOKYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, BEŞERİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ, İNGİLİZ DİLİ VE EDEBİYATI BÖLÜMÜ

Abstract

This study intends to foreground Thomas Hardy’s (1840-1928) social and ecological responsibility to the ongoing animal exploitation by analyzing his poems from the perspective of a recently emerging theory of critical animal studies. Hardy’s poetic responsiveness to the unjust human treatment of animals as disposable materials to be used and consumed is worthy of critical attention pertaining to his depiction of animals as self-conscious, intelligent, and emotional individuals. Going against the conventional anthropocentric assumptions of the Victorian period perceiving animals as insentient, passive, and automated objects who cannot feel pain and suffering, Hardy adopts an animal-oriented viewpoint and confronts his readers with the dreadful consequences of implacable human attitude to animals. In addition to giving voice to animals who are tortured and murdered for trivial human reasons, Hardy disentangles the indubitable principles of humanity and its moral standards which give consent to the infliction of pain and anguish on another living being. While questioning the morality of human values, Hardy depicts animals as moral communities who are perfectly accomplished and sufficiently advanced to initiate meaningful interaction with their environment. An elucidation of Hardy’s poetry from the viewpoint of critical animal studies, hence, will provide a broad insight into Hardy’s scientific understanding of the universe, replete with intelligent, socially and emotionally developed individuals who deserve respect and approbation of humans.

Publisher

Ankara University

Reference27 articles.

1. Adams, C. J. (2010). The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist Vegetarian Critical Theory. New York: Continuum.

2. Beakley, A. (2000). The Animalizing Imagination: Totemism, Textuality and Ecocriticism. Great Britain: Macmillan Press.

3. Calarco, M. (2015). Thinking Through Animals: Identity, Difference, Indistinction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

4. Cavalieri, P. (2001). The Animal Question: Why Nonhuman Animals Deserve Human Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.

5. Derrida, Jacques. 2008. The Animal That Therefore I Am. M.-L. Mallet (Ed.). (D. Wills, Trans.). New York: Fordham University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3