Did selection for seed traits across the Cretaceous/Paleogene boundary sort plants based on ploidy?

Abstract

Paleobotanists debate whether the Cretaceous/Paleogene boundary (KPB) event was selective. As the hypothesis that the KPB event selected for plants with fast-return leaf economic traits (e.g. deciduousness) has lost empirical support in recent investigations, researchers have turned to alternative hypotheses to explain an abrupt decline in primary productivity across the KPB. Two contemporary hypotheses designed to explain selectivity among plants across the KPB are that (1) polyploids exhibited greater survivorship than their diploid progenitors or counterparts (i.e. the KPB-whole genome duplication or WGD hypothesis) and that (2) plants with desiccation-tolerant (DT), i.e. orthodox, seeds exhibited greater survivorship than plants with desiccationsensitive (DS), also known as recalcitrant, seeds. Late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) protein gene families are perceived to confer DT and seed longevity among vascular plants. Non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test for matched pairs and a Mann-Whitney U test reveal that plant lineages perceived to have undergone WGD across the KPB exhibit significantly greater numbers of LEA genes than those that did not. On the basis of these data, this investigation elicits a merger between the KPB-WGD and KPB-seed traits concepts. However, emphasis is shifted from the concept of WGD as an immediate adaptation to climatic stress at the KPB (the KPB-WGD hypothesis) to the concept that WGD was an exaptation, which, by definition, fortuitously enhanced the survival of vascular plants across the KPB but that probably evolved initially in other climatic contexts.