Author:
Sudarmaningtyas Pantjawati,Mohamed Rozlina
Abstract
The Agile effort estimation involves project-related and people-related factors. This research objective is to find the factors that influence Agile effort estimation significantly through path analysis using a structural equation model. This research built an agile effort estimation path coefficient model from six constructs from theories and previous studies. Project-related factors represent by requirement and design implementation constructs. People-related factors are measured by the construct of experience, knowledge, and technical ability. The last construct is the effort itself. SmartPLS is employed for the confirmatory composite analysis and the structural model assessment. The confirmatory composite analysis indicated that all constructs are reliable and valid. Furthermore, the structural model assessment found that all factors of project-related constructs have a positive relationship and significant influence, showing a coefficient path value of 59.1% between requirement and design implementation constructs. All constructs represent people-related factors indicated by the coefficient path value of 67% between experience and knowledge, 42.6% between experience and technical ability, and 54.4% between knowledge and technical ability. In addition, all constructs proved influential simultaneously to effort by 31.1%. Positively contribute provided by requirement, experience, and technology’s ability. Significantly influenced provided by constructs of the developer’s knowledge and technical ability. The largest effect is given by technical ability, knowledge, and experience on medium and small scales. Contrarily, both constructs from project-related effects can be negligible because there was no influence. Based on the result, this study concludes that the significant factors in Agile effort estimation are technical ability, knowledge, and experience.
Publisher
Universiti Putra Malaysia
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference32 articles.
1. Abrahamsson, P., Salo, O., Ronkainen, J., & Warsta, J. (2002). Agile software development methods: Review and analysis. arXiv Preprint. http://arxiv.org/abs/1709.08439
2. Adnan, M., & Afzal, M. (2017). Ontology based multiagent effort estimation system for scrum agile method. IEEE Access, 5, 25993-26005. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2771257
3. Asnawi, A. L., Gravell, A. M., & Wills, G. B. (2012). Factor analysis: Investigating important aspects for agile adoption in Malaysia. In 2012 Agile India (pp. 60-63). IEEE Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1109/AgileIndia.2012.13
4. Bloch, M., Blumberg, S., & Laartz, J. (2012). Delivering Large Scale IT.pdf. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/digital-mckinsey/our-insights/delivering-large-scale-it-projects-on-time-on-budget-and-on-value
5. Boehm, B. (2006). A view of 20th and 21st century software engineering. In Proceeding of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering - ICSE ’06 (pp. 12-29). ACM Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1145/1134285.1134288
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献