Abstract
Syk is a tyrosine kinase important to bridge the receptor ligation and downstream signallings such as Ca2+ and PI3K. Once the cell receptor binds with the ligand, FCϵRIγ (ITAM receptor) is recruited and phosphorylated by Lyn. The phosphorylated ITAM then recruits protein tyrosine kinase (Syk). The previously developed FCϵRIγ (FCϵ) model contained a greater level of complexity. This study aims to build a simple model of signalling of FCϵ that still represents biological understanding. The parameter estimation is addressed using least-squares optimisation, which implements the Levenburg-Marquardt gradient method (greedy algorithm) to minimise an objective function. More importantly, this model was fitted to two data sets that captured a temporal FCϵ, Syk and Grb2 phosphorylation. Model uncertainty often has done as an analysis that is carried out after model construction and calibration have been completed. This study assessed for sensitivity to parameter choices and model uncertainty to perform the analysis. The modular design principles are applied to the construction of the model. The model is designed to be reproducible. In other words, the model can be effectively applied in simulation conditions or optimised to new datasets for new experimental situations.
Publisher
Universiti Putra Malaysia
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference18 articles.
1. Benhamou, M., Mkaddem, S. B., & Monteiro, R. C. (2019). Understanding Fc receptor involvement in inflammatory diseases: From mechanisms to new therapeutic tools. Frontiers in Immunology, 10, Article 811. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00811
2. Blank, U., Huang, H., & Kawakami, T. (2021). The high affinity IgE receptor: A signaling update. Current Opinion in Immunology, 72, 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2021.03.015
3. Cooling, M. (2007). Modelling the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate / calcineurin signal transduction pathway in the cardiac myocyte (Doctoral dissertation). University of Auckland, New Zealand.
4. Cooling, M. T., Hunter, P., &, Crampin, E. J. (2008). Modelling biological modularity with CeIIML. IET Systems Biology, 2(2), 73-79. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-syb:20070020
5. Cooling, M. T., Nickerson, D. P., Nielsen, P. M., & Hunter, P. J. (2016). Modular modelling with physiome standards. The Journal of Physiology, 594(23), 6817-6831. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP272633