Teaching Styles Pattern: A Survey of Mathematics Teacher's Preferences in Primary School

Author:

Abstract

In the current wave of educational reforms, understanding teaching styles of mathematics can help modify strategies for effective teaching. This survey research which using quantitative approach was aimed to identify teaching styles pattern by primary school mathematics Year 5 teachers. The research population consists of 506 Year 5 mathematics teachers from Malacca primary school. A total of 217 mathematics teachers were randomly selected as respondents. Data were collected through a translated version of Grasha Teaching Style Inventory. Descriptive statistics were analyzing the finding. Statistical inference is used to analyze the difference in teaching style based on the teachers' background, which is gender and teaching experience. In direction of the data with means, frequencies, t-test and one way ANOVA; the formal authority is the dominant, which is for male year 5 mathematics teachers, while female mathematics teachers prefer to personal model teaching style. Meanwhile, formal authority was the highest means for teaching experience over 21 years. The was a statistically significant difference between the male and female teacher in delegator style. Likewise, there was a significant difference in teachers teaching style based on teaching experience in expert style and formal authority style. Teachers need to diversify teaching styles in teaching.

Publisher

Universiti Putra Malaysia

Subject

General Mathematics

Reference61 articles.

1. A. K. Ahmed (2013). Teacher-centered versus learner-centered teaching style. The Journal of Global Business Management, 9(1), 22–34.

2. S. Ahmed, M. T. Khan Farooqi & A. Iqbal (2021). A study of teachers’ teaching styles and students’ performance. Ilkogretim Online- Elementary Education Online, 19(4), 5418–5426.

3. M. Aliakbari & N. Soltani (2009). Variation of learning styles among Iranian EFL learners: Effects of culture, language background and gender. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, pp. 200–209.

4. N. Anriani, A. Pamungkas, K. Iskandar & A. Istiandaru (2019). Improving logical thinking skills using HOTS-based mathematics teaching material. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012093.

5. B. B. Apaydin & S. Cenberci (2018). Correlation between thinking styles and teaching styles of prospective mathematics teachers. World Journal of Education, 8(4), 36–46. https://doi.org/ 10.5430/wje.v8n4p36.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3