Social Inclusion and Exclusion of Women Directors in Malaysia
-
Published:2021-12-03
Issue:4
Volume:29
Page:2483-2501
-
ISSN:2231-8534
-
Container-title:Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JSSH
Author:
Chan Kim Ling Geraldine1, Hamid Bahiyah Abdul2, Selvadurai Sivapalan3
Affiliation:
1. Centre for Research in Development, Social and Environment, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia 2. Centre for Research in Language and Linguistics, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia 3. School of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences and Leisure Management, Taylor’s University, 47500 Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
Abstract
Modern society is currently experiencing strong influences in the 21st-century that are shaping culture, structure and various institutional features. Although modern rational value systems supersede traditional ones, some traditional and modern values still coexist. The blurring of the modern-traditional values dichotomy is the result, even now in the Malaysian corporate world, shaping corporate and economic behaviour and practices. The social inclusion and exclusion of women in board directorship are influenced by traditional values as much as modern values, hence challenging male board dominance. Based on a qualitative research methodology, this paper discusses some empirical findings. Semi-structured interviews with 17 male and female directors from public-listed (PLCs) and private companies in Malaysia found the coexistence of traditional and modern values and related aspects that have enabled women to get appointed, empowered, and sustain their appointment on the PLCs boards. Modern values like rationality, efficiency, meritocracy, professionalism, and individuality coexist with traditional personalism, trust, loyalty and patriarchy (notably male status quo dominance). These values are portrayed through hard and soft skills, technical and practical business knowledge, some personality traits and professional business and work experiences. This social inclusion and exclusion aspects will drive the rise, withdrawal, exit or even avoidance of women as company directors of PLCs in Malaysia. This blurring dichotomy argument may hold for as long as the society subscribes to the coexistence of modern and traditional values systems in modern corporate Malaysia.
Publisher
Universiti Putra Malaysia
Reference68 articles.
1. Abdullah, S. N., Zainal, A. H., Abu, B. I., & Rahman, A. U. (2016). The appointment process for independent directors in Malaysian listed companies. Corporate Ownership and Control, 14(1), 519- 531. 2. Aldrich, H. E., & Reuf, M. (1999). Organisations evolving. SAGE Publications. 3. Alvarez, S. A., & Busenitz, L. W. (2001). The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. Journal of Management, 27(6), 755-775. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/014920630102700609 4. Amran, N. A., Ismail, K. N. I. K., Aripin, N., Hassan, N., Manaf, K. B. A., & Abdullah, S. N. (2014). Women directors’ involvement in Malaysia. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 8(5), 226-231. 5. Andarajah, K. (2001). Corporate governance: A practical approach. Butterworths Asia.
|
|