Author:
SUMARTA NURMADI HARSA,AMIDJAYA PRIHATNOLO GANDHI,PRABOWO MUHAMMAD AGUNG,MULYANINGSIH TRI
Abstract
Following the increased concern on sustainability reporting in Indonesia, this study
attempts to investigate whether the issuance of sustainability report is able to provide
positive impact on bank reputation and market valuation. We use a set of unbalanced
panel data that consist of 43 Indonesian listed banks throughout 2010-2018 while our
analysis is performed with panel data regression using STATA statistics software. Overall, the findings demonstrate that environmental disclosure provides positive impact on market valuation while economic and social disclosure do not. We also find the mediating role of bank reputation between the link of environmental disclosure and market valuation. By splitting the observation period into pre and post sustainable finance roadmap implementation, we find that economic disclosure holds significant contribution to increasing market valuation in the period before sustainable finance roadmap implementation while social and environmental disclosure demonstrate positive effect in the period when sustainable finance roadmap is implemented. This study, however, still contains limitation due to the use of content analysis in assessing sustainability report quality that may contain subjectivity issue. Further studies can obtain external assurance from independent experts in this subject. The use of quantitative-qualitative mixed method may also be a solution to solve this issue. This study provides several implications. Firstly, this study supports the regulation from the Indonesia Financial Service Authority to increase the participation of Indonesian banks in sustainability reporting in which the implementation must be followed with high regulation enforcement. We also suggest the practice of sustainability reporting for Indonesian listed banks as it gives considerable benefit in higher market valuation. This research addresses the gap in Indonesian literature that is limited on determinant study by providing more insights on how sustainability reporting provides on higher bank reputation and market valuation.
Publisher
Universiti Putra Malaysia
Subject
Strategy and Management,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Business and International Management
Reference83 articles.
1. 1. Afolabi, H., Ram, R. and Rimmel, G, 2022. Harmonization of Sustainability Reporting Regulation: Analysis of a Contested Arena. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(9), pp. 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095517
2. 2. Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y. and Zhang, C, 2013. Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Management Science, 65(10), pp. 4451–4469. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3043
3. 3. Amidjaya, P. G. and Widagdo, A. K, 2019. Sustainability reporting in Indonesian listed banks: Do corporate governance, ownership structure and digital banking matter? Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 21(2), pp. 231–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-09-2018-0149
4. 4. Aras, G. and Crowther, D, 2009. Corporate sustainability reporting: A study in disingenuity? Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), pp. 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9806-0
5. 5. Atan, R., Razali, A., Said, J. and Zainun, S, 2016. Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosure and Its Effect on Firm’s Performance: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Economics and Management Journal Homepage, 10(S2), pp. 355–375. Retrieved from http://www.econ.upm.edu.my/ijem
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献