Author:
Mohd Khalid Nor Hafizi,Abdul Latif Adibah,Megat Zakaria Megat Aman Zahiri,Yusof Ibnatul Jalilah,Md Jani Md Daud
Abstract
This study was conducted to identify constructs and subconstructs of teacher classroom assessment literacy instrument. Qualitative document analysis was conducted to identify the constructs and subconstructs used. This document covers previous research articles, modules, and standard documents used in conducting classroom assessments. The qualitative data are analyzed using the literature review system model with four thematic analysis phases. Four main themes or constructs of classroom assessment literacy are derived from the document analysis: Purpose, Measurement, Evaluation, and Use. These four themes are used as the basis for analyzing the Classroom Assessment Standard and Classroom Assessment Implementation Guide from the Ministry of Education Malaysia as the main reference of the study. Besides, four 21st-century assessment features, nine classroom assessment features, and five features of high-order thinking skills items are also included in the analysis as an added value in the constructs and subconstructs. Based on the analysis, three subconstructs for the purpose component, seven for the measurement component, four for the assessment component, and five for the usage component are identified. All these findings are incorporated into the teacher’s assessment literacy instrument.
Publisher
Universiti Putra Malaysia
Reference51 articles.
1. American Federation of Teachers, National Council on Measurement in Education, & National Education Association. (1990). Standards for Teacher Competence in Educational Assessment of Students. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9(4), 30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1990.tb00391.x
2. Ashraf, H., & Zolfaghari, S. (2018). EFL teachers’ assessment literacy and their reflective teaching. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 425-436. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11129a
3. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
4. Burns, N., & Grove, S. K. (1993). The practice of nursing research conduct,critique, and utilization (3rd ed.). WB Saunders Company.
5. Chappius, J., Stinggins, R. J., Chappius, S., & Arter, J. A. (2012). Classroom assessment for student learning: Doing it right-using it well. (2nd ed.). Assessment Training Institute Inc.