Flow Analysis and Shear Rate Comparison of Counter-rotating and Co-rotating Intermeshing Twin-screw Extruders for Filament Extrusion of Polypropylene-based Biocomposites
-
Published:2024-06-14
Issue:S2
Volume:32
Page:1-20
-
ISSN:2231-8526
-
Container-title:Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JST
Author:
Hidayat Syah Lubis Abdul Munir,Abdul Kudus Syahibudil Ikhwan,Amran Ammar Syafi,Mustafa Nuzaimah,Mohammad Taha Mastura,Shaharuzaman Mohd Adrinata
Abstract
This study investigates and compares the performance of counter-rotating and co-rotating intermeshing twin-screw designs in filament extruder machines. The research sought to determine whether the counter-rotating intermeshing design with its opposite flow direction offers advantages over the co-rotating intermeshing design in terms of flow analysis and shear rates. Flow analysis was conducted to examine the velocity of the polypropylene-based biocomposite material inside the barrel. Shear rate data was obtained by evaluating the relationship between shear rate and screw speed to assess the stability and maximum shear rate of the twin-screw extruders. The results revealed that the counter-rotating intermeshing twin-screw extruders exhibited higher shear rates and more consistent pressure compared to the co-rotating intermeshing design. The superiority of the counter-rotating extruder was attributed to its opposite flow direction and distinct thread shapes, facilitating efficient material compression and improved dispersion of polymer-based biocomposite materials. The study suggested the potential for further exploration and refinement of the counter-rotating intermeshing twin-screw extruder design, particularly in producing polypropylene-based biocomposite filaments for Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) machines.
Publisher
Universiti Putra Malaysia
Reference44 articles.
1. Aida, H. J., Nadlene, R., Mastura, M. T., Yusriah, L., Sivakumar, D., & Ilyas, R. A. (2021). Natural fibre filament for Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM): A review. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 14(6), 1988–2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2021.1962426 2. Balla, V. K., Kate, K. H., Satyavolu, J., Singh, P., & Tadimeti, J. G. D. (2019). Additive manufacturing of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites: Processing and prospects. Composites Part B: Engineering, 174, Article 106956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106956 3. Bauer, H., Matić, J., Evans, R. C., Gryczke, A., Ketterhagen, W., Sinha, K., & Khinast, J. (2022). Determining local residence time distributions in twin-screw extruder elements via smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Chemical Engineering Science, 247, Article 117029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2021.117029 4. Calì, M., Pascoletti, G., Gaeta, M., Milazzo, G., & Ambu, R. (2020). A new generation of bio-composite thermoplastic filaments for a more sustainable design of parts manufactured by FDM. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 10(17), Article 5852. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10175852 5. Chen, B., Zhu, L., Zhang, F., & Qiu, Y. (2017). Process development and scale-up: Twin-screw extrusion. In Y. Qiu, Y. Chen, G. Z. Zhang, L. Yu & R. V. Mantri (Eds.), Developing Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Pharmaceutical Theory and Practice. (2nd ed.: pp. 821-868). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802447-8.00031-5
|
|