Assessment of Indoor Air Quality at Different Sites of Higher Educational Buildings of a University, Shah Alam
-
Published:2022-07-22
Issue:s9
Volume:18
Page:1-7
-
ISSN:1675-8544
-
Container-title:Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:MJMHS
Author:
Azlan Nur Batrisyia,Mohd Suadi Nata Dayana Hazwani,Mohd Uzid Mahathir
Abstract
Introduction: Indoor air quality is an important aspect in defining Sick Building Syndrome (SBS). SBS triggered by
inadequate IAQ may harm occupants. Objective: This study was conducted to establish the relationship between
IAQ and SBS in the higher educational building. Methods: The research method is divided into three main categories; indoor air chemical and contaminant analysis, microbiological contaminant analysis, and questionnaire.
A cross-sectional study was conducted at seven locations in a university in Shah Alam. Results: The results were
compared to the Department of Occupational Safety and Health standard (DOSH). Significant correlation with temperature (p<0.05), relative humidity (p<0.05), and particulate matter (PM10) (p<0.05) were found.This study suggests
that enhancing housekeeping standards and monitoring indoor air quality can enhance the indoor air quality in Malaysian higher education buildings. Conclusion: Based on correlation between IAQ and SBS symptoms, poor IAQ
and SBS symptoms among occupants may impact teaching and learning process in the university. Conclusion: This
study suggests that enhancing housekeeping standards and monitoring indoor air quality can enhance the indoor air
quality in Malaysian higher education buildings.
Publisher
Universiti Putra Malaysia
Reference29 articles.
1. 1. Petty, S. E. (2017). Indoor environmental quality. In Forensic Engineering: Damage Assessments for Residential and Commercial Structures. https://doi.org/10.1201/b14052 2. 2. Ba Lai, P. S., Sheehan, W. J., Gaffin, J. M., Petty, C. R., Coull, B. A., Gold, D. R., & Phipatanakul, W. (2015). School endotoxin exposure and asthma morbidity in inner-city children. Chest, 148(5), 1251–1258. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.15-0098 3. 3. Bennett, J., Davy, P., Trompetter, B., Wang, Y., Pierse, N., Boulic, M., Phipps, R., & Howden-Chapman, P. (2019). Sources of indoor air pollution at a New Zealand Urban Primary School; a case study. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 10(2), 435–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2018.09.006 4. 4. Marques, G., & Pitarma, R. (2019). Indoor air quality monitoring for enhanced healthy buildings. Indoor Environmental Quality. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81478 5. 5. Zainal, Z. A., Hashim, Z., Jalaludin, J., Lee, L. F., & Hashim, J. H. (2019). Sick Building Syndrome among Office Workers in relation to Office Environment and Indoor Air Pollutant at an Academic Institution, Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences, 15(3), 126–134.
|
|