Author:
Salami Salami,Choo Soon Siew,Mohd Said Faridah,Wilandika Angga
Abstract
Introduction: Uncontrolled hypertension is a leading cause of death worldwide and self-care is one of the essential management strategies. However, data regarding the psychometric properties of self-care instruments in the Indonesian context is lacking. This study aims to validate the Hypertension Self-care Profile (HBP SCP) instrument in the Indonesia version. Methods: A forward-backward translation technique was used for the Hypertension (HBP SCP) questionnaire. This questionnaire had three domains namely motivation, self-efficacy, and behavior. It was completed by a total of 191 respondents and the survey was conducted from September to December 2021 in the Health Primary Care Bandung West Java, Indonesia. The Cronbach’s alpha was used to test the reliability scale, the content validity index was assessed by five experts, and item inter-correlation was analyzed to test the total items. Results: The results showed that the content validity index was in the excellent category with a value of 0.89. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.875, indicating satisfactory internal consistency. Furthermore, the total items correlation had a significance value of 0.05 (df = N-2) for the three scales namely 0.353-0.742, 0.302- 0.642, and 0.237-0.649 for motivation, self-efficacy, and behavior, respectively. Conclusion: The Indonesian version of the Hypertension HBP SCP instrument is valid and reliable.
Publisher
Universiti Putra Malaysia
Reference27 articles.
1. 1. World Health Organization. Self-care in the Context of Primary Health Care; Report of the Regional Consultation Bangkok, Thailand, 7-9 Januari 2009. World Heal Organ [Internet]. 2009;(January):7–9. Available from: http://www.searo.who.int/entity/primary_health_care/documents/sea_hsd_320.pdf
2. 2. Rapsomaniki E, Timmis A, George J, Pujades-Rodriguez M, Shah AD, Denaxas S, et al. Blood pressure and incidence of twelve cardiovascular diseases: Lifetime risks, healthy life-years lost, and age-specific associations in 1·25 million people. Lancet. 2014;383(9932):1899–911. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60685-1.
3. 3. Kaptoge S, Pennells L, De Bacquer D, Cooney MT, Kavousi M, Stevens G, et al. World Health Organization cardiovascular disease risk charts: revised models to estimate risk in 21 global regions. Lancet Glob Heal. 2019;7(10):e1332–45. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30318-3.
4. 4. Peltzer K, Pengpid S. The Prevalence and Social Determinants of Hypertension among Adults in Indonesia: A Cross-Sectional Population-Based National Survey. Int J Hypertens. 2018;2018. doi: 10.1155/2018/5610725.
5. 5. KEMENKES. Hasil Utama Riskesdas Tentang Prevalensi Diabetes Mellitus di Indonesia 2018. Has Utama Riskesdas Tentang Prevalensi Diabetes Melitus di Indones 2018. 2018;8.