Author:
San San Oo,Aung Myat Moe Thwe,Ibrahim Mohd Salami,Nyi Nyi Naing,Mat Azmi Intan Suhana Munira,Abd Aziz Aniza,Aung San Thitsa
Abstract
Introduction: General population across different countries have shown an overall support for anti-smoking measures that vary significantly by certain population parameters. However, characteristics of the public attitude in a community who has been exposed to prolonged awareness campaigns and smoke-free area legislation is unclear. Consequently, we investigate residents who reside next to Batu Buruk beach in Kuala Terengganu city which has been gazetted as a smoke-free area since 2017. Methods: The cross-sectional study involves self-administered validated questionnaires. Multiple linear regression with forward method was applied to identify significant factors associated with the attitude towards anti-smoking measures. Results: A total of 295 residents participated. Most of them were Malays (96.6%), married (64.4%), attained up to the secondary school level (45.4%) and employed (59.7%). The mean value of the total attitude scores was 181.86 (range: 70-200). Multivariate analyses revealed those having higher monthly income had a higher total attitude scores (adjusted b: 6.91, 95% CI: 2.15, 11.66), while current daily smokers had a lower total attitude scores towards anti-smoking measures than non-smokers (adjusted b: -23.30, 95% CI: -29.55, -17.05). These findings highlight comparatively stronger and more consistent support for anti-smoking measures that may vindicate high-stake investment and legislation against smoking. Conclusion: The novel evidence may also better-inform the strategy to expand the initiatives further through profiling the target population with heightened emphasis on the economic standing and prevalence of current daily smokers. Future research may adopt experimental design to establish causality relationship between predictors and outcomes revealed in this community.
Publisher
Universiti Putra Malaysia
Reference16 articles.
1. 1. CDC. Smoking and Tobacco Use USA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2020. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/basic_information/health_effects/index.htm.
2. 2. Forey BA, Thornton AJ, Lee PN. Systematic review with meta-analysis of the epidemiological evidence relating smoking to COPD, chronic bronchitis and emphysema. BMC Pulmonary Medicine. 2011;11(1):36. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-11-36.
3. 3. Furrukh M. Tobacco Smoking and Lung Cancer: Perception-changing facts. Sultan Qaboos University medical journal. 2013;13(3):345-58. doi: 10.12816/0003255.
4. 4. Roy A, Rawal I, Jabbour S, Prabhakaran D. Tobacco and Cardiovascular Disease: A Summary of Evidence. In: Prabhakaran D, Anand S, Gaziano TA, Mbanya JC, Wu Y, Nugent R, editors. Cardiovascular, Respiratory, and Related Disorders. Washington (DC): The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank© 2017 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank.; 2017.
5. 5. WHO. Tobacco Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2021 [Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/tobacco#tab=tab_1.