Author:
Shamsudin Syazawani,Kamaludin Nurul Farahana,Sazali Nur Mariam,Awang Normah,Ithnin Anuar
Abstract
Introduction: As humans spend 90% of their time inside, indoor air quality (IAQ) is critical for occupant health. The primary concern associated with low IAQ is its impact on employees’ health, comfort, and productivity. In accordance with the Industry Code of Practice on Indoor Air Quality 2010 (ICOP IAQ 2010), a ten-parameter assessment was conducted in the office of the transformer manufacturing factory in Selangor, Malaysia. Methods: The measured parameters are temperature, air movement, relative humidity, carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), formaldehyde (CH2O), particulate matter (PM10), total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs), total fungal count (TFC), and total bacterial count (TBC). This study employed both qualitative and quantitative approaches by distributing questionnaires (N = 42), and measuring the indoor air quality parameters with integrated equipment at selected stations and comparing them to the ICOP IAQ 2010 standard. Results: A majority of the measures, with the exception of air movement, CO2, and TBC, complied with the ICOP IAQ 2010 standards. The one-way ANOVA test showed that there were significant differences (p < 0.05) for the parameters of temperature, PM10, and TVOCs. The Chi-Square test revealed that sleepiness was a symptom of the sick building syndrome, affecting both male and female employees the most frequently and significantly. Conclusion: Air movement, CO2, and TBC values that did not meet ICOP IAQ 2010 requirements revealed poor IAQ at the study site, which could have a negative influence on the employees’ health. To cut down on air pollution, the improvement on the ventilation system should be done to reduce the risks to the employees’ health.
Publisher
Universiti Putra Malaysia
Reference36 articles.
1. 1. Department of Standards of Malaysia. Malaysian Standard MS 1722:2011: Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Management System-Requirements (First Revision). Selangor, Malaysia. 2011.
2. 2. Wang M, Li L, Hou C, Guo X, Fu H. Building and Health: Mapping the knowledge development of sick building syndrome. Buidlings 2022;12(3):287.doi: 10.3390/buildings12030287
3. 3. Department of Safety and Health. Industry Code of Practice on Indoor Air Quality. 2010. [cited 2021 June 10]. Available from http://www.dosh.gov.my/index.php/chemical-management-v/indoor-air-quality.
4. 4. United State of Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). An introduction to indoor air quality. 2016. [cited 2021 June 10]. Available from https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/introduction-indoor-air-quality, 2016.
5. 5. Mustafa S, Ansari MA, Murtaza Q, Farooq M, Khan AA. Humanizing Education in Higher Classes: An Overview of Thermal Comfort and Other Parameters Affecting Human Efficiency. Ergonomics for Improved Productivity. 2022;121-126. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-2229-8_13