MORAL ALIENATION AS A PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTOR OF CORRUPTION

Author:

Zarichanskyi O.A.ORCID,

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to consider moral alienation as one of the psychological mechanisms used by corrupt officials to justify their actions. Research results. The article examines the general mechanism and components of the alienation of moral responsibility, as a phenomenon that is constructed in the experience of a corrupt person and protects his self-esteem at the expense of not applying internal moral sanctions to himself in the conditions of opposing his own behaviour to generally accepted moral norms. The existence of a cognitive mechanism that reinterprets morality in a person in such a way that moral self-regulation is blocked or even does not work has been revealed. Alienation of moral responsibility is presented as an important psychological construct, the application of which to the description and explanation of such a socio-legal phenomenon as corruption is productive and useful for predicting corrupt behaviour. Conclusions. Foreign studies were analysed, which show various contexts of corruption implemented in recent years; a grouping of the collected scientific material was carried out, taking into account the great heterogeneity of the presented works, and those of them were singled out, which reveal precisely the psychological perspectives of the given topic; the largest thorough empirical studies are analysed; a synthesis of the obtained material was carried out and further possible directions of scientific research were determined. Key words: justification, cognitive reconstruction, corruption, moral selfregulation, moral alienation, moral standards.

Publisher

Academy Of The State Penitentiary Servise

Subject

General Medicine

Reference35 articles.

1. Milgram, S. (1963), Behavioural Study of Obedience, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, № 67, рр. 376-391.

2. Kohlberg, L. (1984), The Psychology of Moral Development: The Nature and Validity of Moral Stages, Essays on Moral Development / in Kohlberg, L. (Ed.), Vol. 2: The Philosophy of Moral Development. San Francisco: Harper & Row Publishers.

3. Bandura, A. (2016), Moral Disengagement: How People Do Harm and Live with Themselves, Worth Publishers, New York.

4. Bandura, A. (2002.), Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency, Journal of moral education, Vol. 31, № 2, рр. 101-119.

5. Bandura, A. (1985), Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory, Englewood Cliff s, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3