Determining the Number of Topics to Retain using Tools from Factor Analysis

Author:

Holmes Finch

Abstract

Abstract Determining the optimal number of topics to retain in the conduct of topic modeling (TM) has received much attention over the last decade. Despite this work, issues remain regarding the best methods to use for making such determinations. Approaches involving the use of relatively simple statistics, most notably perplexity, have proven to be somewhat inconsistent. Recently, researchers have suggested the use of change in perplexity scores as a useful heuristic for determining the optimal number of topics to retain. The current study builds on this earlier work by assessing the utility of several methods borrowed from factor analysis and applied to statistics commonly used in topic modeling, including perplexity and Alpha. These new approaches are applied to several textual datasets and compared with more traditional methods for determining the number of topics to retain. Results of these analyses demonstrate that application of these methods borrowed from factor analysis does appear to be effective for identifying the number of topics to retain.

Publisher

Scientific Press International Limited

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Exploring Research Trends Through Topic Modeling of Scopus Data;Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems;2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3