Estimation of Spinal Dysfunction in Construction Site Labourers
Author:
Hiwalkar Tanisha1ORCID, Shinde Sandeep2ORCID, Jain Pooja1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. KRISHNA VISHWA VIDYAPEETH,KRISHNA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES DEEMED TO BE UNIVERSITY,KARAD,MAHARASHTRA 2. KRISHNA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES DEEMED TO BE UNIVERSITY, KARAD, INDIA
Abstract
Purpose: The study aimed to assess the extent of spinal dysfunction experienced by construction site workers, considering factors such as experience, posture, discomfort, range of motion, and muscle strength. Method: This cross-sectional study selected 107 construction workers from various sites using a simple random sample approach, which was secured in writing. The study utilized various assessment tools, including the Double Leg Lowering Test, Nordic Musculoskeletal Pain Rating Scale, and Posture assessment, to evaluate the patient's pain levels using the SPSS version 23.0. Findings: The study found a significant correlation (P=0.0376) between worker type and postural abnormalities. Masons had 68.4% severe lumbar lordosis, 78.9% hyperextended knees, and 86.3% prominent thoracic kyphosis. There was significant correlation (P 0.0001) between the workers' experience and results of the double leg lowering test. Furthermore, there was a significant difference (P= 0.0017) between the Visual Analogue Pain Rating Scale and work experience. As laborers become more experienced, their abdominal muscles may weaken, causing significant tension on their spines. Conclusion: The study concluded that construction site workers with 10+ years of experience, undergo significant spinal dysfunction due to decreased abdominal muscle strength, resulting in increased strain on their spines.
Funder
Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed to be University, Karad, Maharashtra, India.
Publisher
International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences
Reference44 articles.
1. Abrams, D., Davidson, M., Harrick, J., Harcourt, P., Zylinski, M., & Clancy, J., et.al. (2006). Monitoring the change: current trends in outcome measure usage in physiotherapy. Manual therapy, 11(1), 46-53. [CrossRef] 2. Adeyemi, O., Adejuyigbe, S., AkanbI, O., Ismaila, S., & Adekoya, A. F. (2013). Manual lifting task methods and low back pain among construction workers in the Southwestern Nigeria. Global J Res Eng, 13(3), 27-34. [PubMed] 3. Alghadir, A. H., Anwer, S., Iqbal, A., & Iqbal, Z. A. (2018). Test–retest reliability, validity, and minimum detectable change of visual analog, numerical rating, and verbal rating scales for measurement of osteoarthritic knee pain. Journal of pain research, 851-856. [PubMed] 4. Armstrong, T. J. (1986). Upper-extremity posture: definition, measurement and control. The ergonomics of working postures: Models, Methods and Cases. Taylor & Francis, London: 59-73. [PubMed] 5. Armstrong, T. J., Buckle, P., Fine, L. J., Hagberg, M., Jonsson, B., Kilbom, A., et al. (1993). A conceptual model for work-related neck and upper-limb musculoskeletal disorders. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 73-84. [PubMed]
|
|