Examining the Relationship between Foot Medial Arch Height and Short and Medium Distance Running Performances and Some Variables in Athletes
Author:
Temur H. Bayram1ORCID, Esen Hüseyin2ORCID, İnce O. Bilge3ORCID, Karadağ Hüseyin4ORCID
Affiliation:
1. BAYBURT ÜNİVERSİTESİ, BEDEN EĞİTİMİ VE SPOR YÜKSEKOKULU, ANTRENÖRLÜK EĞİTİMİ BÖLÜMÜ, ANTRENÖRLÜK EĞİTİMİ PR. 2. gençlik hizmetleri il müdürlüğü 3. Milli Eğitim 4. İSTANBUL GELİŞİM ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ
Abstract
In this study, the relationship between foot medial arch height, age, height, body weight, body mass index (BMI), calf and thigh thickness and 100-meter and 3000-meter running performances in athletes was investigated. 28 athletes competing in national competitions, with an average age of 18.29±5.68 years, were included in the study on a voluntary basis. The right foot medial arch heights, heights, body weights, calf and thigh thicknesses of the participants were determined. BMI's were calculated. Also, 100 m and 3000 m. running times were determined. Data analyzes were performed using descriptive statistics and correlation tests. As a result of the analysis, 100 m running performance had a negative relationship with the values of height (r= -.377), body weight (r= -.466), BMI (r= -.428) and thigh circumference (r= -.433). It was observed that there was a relationship with the calf circumference measurement value (-.496) at the p<0.01 level. On the other hand, it was determined that the relationship between foot medial arch height (r= -.178) was not significant (p>0.05). On the other hand, 3000 m running performance was negatively affected by height (r= -.493), body weight (r= -.641), BMI (r= -.625) and calf girth thickness (r= -.623). It was determined that it showed significance at the p<0.01 level. It was also determined that there was a significant relationship with medial arch height in a negative direction (r = -.404) and at p < 0.05. As a result, it can be said that foot medial arch height, height, body weight, BMI, thigh and calf circumference thickness values are effective on short and medium distance running performances.
Publisher
International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences
Reference39 articles.
1. Atamtürk, D. (2009). Relationship of flatfoot and high arch with main anthropometric variables. Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, 43(3), 254-259). [CrossRef] 2. Bjelopetrovich, A. (2016). Effects of Body Weight Loading on Arch Height. [CrossRef] 3. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çoklu, Ö., & Köklü, N. (2016). Statistics for social sciences, (18th edition) Ankara. Pegem Publications. 4. Chang, J.-H., Wang, S.-H., Kuo, C.-L., Shen, H. C., Hong, Y.-W., & Lin, L.-C. (2010). Prevalence of flexible flatfoot in Taiwanese school-aged children in relation to obesity, +gender, and age. European journal of pediatrics, 169, 447-452. [CrossRef] 5. Cote, K. P., Brunet, M. E., Gansneder, B. M., & Shultz, S. J. (2005). Effects of pronated and supinated foot postures on static and dynamic postural stability. Journal of athletic training, 40(1), 41 . [PubMed]
|
|