Trademarks in the Light of the Thomas Theorem: a model of a social object ontology

Author:

Babich N.S.1,Batykov I.V.1

Affiliation:

1. Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS), Moscow, Russia

Abstract

The paper considers the reasons for the existence of trademarks as a social phenomenon. The authors reveal three dominant functional explanations: rationalistic, stratification and semantic. A rationalistic model describes a trademark in terms of identifying the source of the goods (the trademark allows the consumer to identify the goods of a particular manufacturer). The stratification explanation defines the function of the trademark in terms of demonstratively maintaining social differentiation and the distribution of prestige. The semantic approach focuses on the trademark as a mental cell in the consumer’s memory archive, which contains information about the product and its associations. All three approaches are characterized by common problems of functional explanation, namely: the logical circle and internal connection with the homeostatic image of the social system. To overcome these problems, the authors propose an approach to the social ontology of trademarks based on the well-known “Thomas theorem”, which allows to establish causal relationships between the subjective and objective world on the basis of the postulation of equality between reality and perception at the level of formation of human actions. The authors demonstrate the explanatory power of the “Thomas theorem” on example of self-fulfilling prophecies that can be observed in the practice of using trademarks, considering the rationalistic, prestigious and semantic functions of trademarks through the prism of this principle.

Publisher

The Association International Academy of Communicology

Subject

General Medicine

Reference42 articles.

1. Aaker D. (2003). Building strong brands. Moscow: Grebennikov publ. (In Rus.).

2. Ball D.W. (1972). The definition of situation: Some theoretical and methodological consequences of taking W.I. Thomas seriously. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. No. 1. P. 61-82.

3. Baudrillard J. (2006). The consumer society. Moscow: Respublika (In Rus.).

4. Bauman Z. (2008). Liquid modernity. Saint Petersburg: Piter (In Rus.).

5. Boudon R. (1998). Social mechanisms without “black boxes”. Sociology on the threshold of the XXI century. Ed. S.I. Grigoryev. Moscow: Intellect. P.109-128 (In Rus.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3