Simulations of Communicative in Screen Culture

Author:

Grigoryev S. L.1

Affiliation:

1. Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy

Abstract

The article raises the problem of transformation of the nature of the communicative in the context of virtualization and digitalization of all spheres of culture. The study is constructed in the form of a commented dialogue with the authors of “Violence and Social Orders. Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History” by D. North, D. Wallis, and B. Weingast1. The review represents the comparison of the types of communication in traditional society, open society and on-screen culture (in a situation of virtual expansion. Contradiction (speech against speech) is considered as a transitional stage from struggle and conflict to screen simulation of communication. The author considers virtualization of the communicative from a critical point of view and therefore draws conclusions regarding personal degradation of a modern communicant – an aborigine of the digital jungle. Such an experience excludes the possibility of a harmonizing dialogue as a process of reconciling contradictions for one simple reason. If speech property turns out to belong exclusively to the individual, then the total impersonality proclaimed by D. North, D. Wallis, and B. Weingast can only be supported by violence implemented through commands. Thus, communicative interaction inevitably degenerates into a communicative impact, which is initially built on the inequality of partners.

Publisher

The Association International Academy of Communicology

Subject

General Medicine

Reference18 articles.

1. Arnold I.V. (1999). Semantics. Stylistics. Intertextuality: Collection of articles, ed. P.E. Bukharkin. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of St. Petersburg University (In Rus.).

2. Baudrillard J. (2000). Symbolic exchange and death (transl.). M.: (In Rus.).

3. Heidegger M. (1993). European nihilism. Time and being (transl.). M.: Republic. P. 63-176 (In Rus.).

4. Kagan M.S. (1988). The world of communication. The problem of intersubjective relations. Moscow: Politizdat (In Rus.).

5. Kaydakov S.V. (2002). Man in the mirror of ancient philosophy. Moscow (In Rus.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3