CONTEXTUALISING THE CONTESTED: XR AS EXPERIMENTAL MUSEOLOGY

Author:

Rivera-Carlisle JoannaORCID

Abstract

Museums are becoming increasingly multi-medial experiences and with the emergence of the metaverse (Coates, 2021), immersive technologies (XR) are projected to form an important part of future museum experiences. With options to provide a multiplicity of non-hierarchical information, support individualised paths through exhibitions, and experiential visits, XR has the potential to help keep visitors engaged around complex and nuanced information (Mulcahy, 2017). Working on devices that most museum visitors already own, XR technologies present a promising move towards more inclusivity, accessibility, and active audience engagement. Contributing to research on the multiple uses of XR in UK museums, this paper focuses on how XR can be operationalised to address contested displays in Western museums. Using an external app for the British Museum as an example, this paper discusses the challenges arising from this intersection, including the entrenchment of immersive technologies in colonial power dichotomies, the risks of performative virtual interventions, and the conflicting agencies museums, companies, and individuals must navigate in this context. The author suggests, as a possible experimental approach, wiki-based XR interactions which engage with non-Eurocentric epistemologies and are co-created by communities commonly disenfranchised in Western museum spaces.

Publisher

UK Zhende Publishing Limited Company

Subject

Museology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Visual Arts and Performing Arts,History,Cultural Studies,Conservation

Reference93 articles.

1. Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0. https://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0621.pdf

2. Ali, M. (2014). Towards a decolonial computing. Ambiguous Technologies: Philosophical Issues, Practical Solutions, Human Nature, International Society of Ethics and Information Technology, 28-35.

3. Appadurai, A. (2008). Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy. In Evans Braziel, J. & Mannur, A. (eds.): Theorizing Diaspora. A Reader (pp. 33-44). Wiley-Blackwell.

4. Critical Whiteness Studies;Applebaum;Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education https,2016

5. Non‐place and placelessness as narratives of loss: Rethinking the notion of place;Arefi;Journal of Urban Design,1999

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3