Abstract
We contrast three very distinct mathematical approaches to the hard problem of consciousness: quantum consciousness, integrated information theory, and the very large-scale dynamical systems simulation of a network of networks. We highlight their features and their associated hypotheses, and we discuss how they are aligned or in conflict. We suggest some challenges to these theories, in considering how they might apply to the human brain as it develops both cognitive and conscious sophistication, from infancy to adulthood. We indicate how an evolutionary perspective challenges the distinct approaches to aver performance advantages and physiological surrogates for consciousness.
Reference38 articles.
1. 1. Chalmers DJ. Facing up to the Problem of Consciousness, Journal of Consciousness Studies. 1995; 2: 200-19.
2. 2. Chalmers DJ. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory, New York: Oxford University Press. 1996.
3. 3. Penrose R. The Emperor's New Mind. New York, NY: Penguin Books. 1989; ISBN 0-14-01-4534-6.
4. 4. Jedlicka P. Revisiting the Quantum Brain Hypothesis: Toward Quantum (Neuro)biology? Front Mol Neurosci. 2017 Nov 7; 10:366. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00366. PMID: 29163041; PMCID: PMC5681944.
5. 5. Lambert N, Chen YN, Cheng YC. Quantum biology. Nature Phys. 2013; 9:10-18. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2474.