Legal regulation of compulsory licensing in European countries (review and comparative analysis)

Author:

Latyntsev Alexander V.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Science and Research Institute of Legal and Integrated Studies

Abstract

The topic of compulsory licensing is one of the most controversial in the field of intellectual property protection, including in our country in modern realities. At the same time, practically none of the legal scholar has any doubts about the need for this measure as a legal mechanism aimed at achieving a compromise between the private interests of patent holders and public interests. However, many questions arise about the possible legal tools for the issuance of compulsory licenses, so it is interesting to review the European experience in the legal regulation of compulsory licensing, followed by a comparative analysis of the legal mechanisms’ features. An overview of the legal regulation features of compulsory licensing in a number of Central European countries is presented: Austria, Hungary, Germany, the Netherlands and Switzerland. The main legal norms of these countries devoted to the issuance of compulsory licenses are highlighted, with their subsequent comparative analysis. Thus, it was noted that, despite the commonality of approaches, in different States the possible grounds and conditions, as well as the authorized bodies and procedures for issuing compulsory licenses differ depending on the historically developed national characteristics of civil and administrative legislation. Countries are identified in which compulsory licensing is carried out administratively or judicially. Special attention is paid to the legal norms of European countries on decision-making procedures, on the specifics of compulsory licensing in identifying anti-competitive practices on the part of the patent holder, etc. Examples of the issuance or refusal to issue compulsory licenses are also considered.

Publisher

Tambov State University - G.R. Derzhavin

Reference16 articles.

1. 1. Eremenko V.I. (2008). Isklyucheniya iz patentnoi monopolii v sootvetstvii s chast’yu chetvertoi GK RF [Exceptions to the patent monopoly in accordance with Part Four of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation]. Zakonodatel’stvo i ehkonomika [Legislation and economics], no. 8, pp. 28-34. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/jumybd

2. 2. Sannikova L.V., Kharitonova Yu.S. (2019). Protection of patent holders’ rights under a conflict of drug patents. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki = Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Yuridicheskie Nauki, no. 43, pp. 121-145. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2019-43-121-145, https://elibrary.ru/zwwcsi

3. 3. Sitdikova R.I. (2013). Obespechenie chastnykh, obshchestvennykh i publichnykh interesov avtorskim pravom [Securing Private, Public and Public Interests with Copyright]. Moscow, Statut Publ., 159 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vzmkkv

4. 4. Ivanov A.Yu. (2017). Compulsory licensing for stimulating innovation:on the necessity to balance the intellectual property regime. Zakon = Statute, no. 5, pp. 78-93. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ynuepn

5. 5. Sinitsyn S.A. (2022). Sravnitel’noe patentnoe pravo: aktual’nye problem [Comparative Patent Law: Current Issues]. Moscow, Infotropik Media Publ., 416 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/lytasc

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3