Affiliation:
1. Science and Research Institute of Legal and Integrated Studies
Abstract
The topic of compulsory licensing is one of the most controversial in the field of intellectual property protection, including in our country in modern realities. At the same time, practically none of the legal scholar has any doubts about the need for this measure as a legal mechanism aimed at achieving a compromise between the private interests of patent holders and public interests. However, many questions arise about the possible legal tools for the issuance of compulsory licenses, so it is interesting to review the European experience in the legal regulation of compulsory licensing, followed by a comparative analysis of the legal mechanisms’ features. An overview of the legal regulation features of compulsory licensing in a number of Central European countries is presented: Austria, Hungary, Germany, the Netherlands and Switzerland. The main legal norms of these countries devoted to the issuance of compulsory licenses are highlighted, with their subsequent comparative analysis. Thus, it was noted that, despite the commonality of approaches, in different States the possible grounds and conditions, as well as the authorized bodies and procedures for issuing compulsory licenses differ depending on the historically developed national characteristics of civil and administrative legislation. Countries are identified in which compulsory licensing is carried out administratively or judicially. Special attention is paid to the legal norms of European countries on decision-making procedures, on the specifics of compulsory licensing in identifying anti-competitive practices on the part of the patent holder, etc. Examples of the issuance or refusal to issue compulsory licenses are also considered.
Publisher
Tambov State University - G.R. Derzhavin
Reference16 articles.
1. 1. Eremenko V.I. (2008). Isklyucheniya iz patentnoi monopolii v sootvetstvii s chast’yu chetvertoi GK RF [Exceptions to the patent monopoly in accordance with Part Four of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation]. Zakonodatel’stvo i ehkonomika [Legislation and economics], no. 8, pp. 28-34. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/jumybd
2. 2. Sannikova L.V., Kharitonova Yu.S. (2019). Protection of patent holders’ rights under a conflict of drug patents. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki = Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Yuridicheskie Nauki, no. 43, pp. 121-145. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2019-43-121-145, https://elibrary.ru/zwwcsi
3. 3. Sitdikova R.I. (2013). Obespechenie chastnykh, obshchestvennykh i publichnykh interesov avtorskim pravom [Securing Private, Public and Public Interests with Copyright]. Moscow, Statut Publ., 159 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vzmkkv
4. 4. Ivanov A.Yu. (2017). Compulsory licensing for stimulating innovation:on the necessity to balance the intellectual property regime. Zakon = Statute, no. 5, pp. 78-93. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ynuepn
5. 5. Sinitsyn S.A. (2022). Sravnitel’noe patentnoe pravo: aktual’nye problem [Comparative Patent Law: Current Issues]. Moscow, Infotropik Media Publ., 416 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/lytasc