Affiliation:
1. Belgorod State National Research University
2. Southwest State University
Abstract
The work is devoted to the analysis of the conceptual zero project of the pandemic agreement presented at the second meeting of the Intergovernmental negotiating function of the World Health Organization in December 2021. The purpose of the study is to determine the ratio of national and supranational elements in the regulation of global impact and global decision-making within the framework of the world health architecture being created. The methodological basis of the study is such principles of scientific cognition as objectivity, comprehensiveness, consistency, complexity. The work uses such methods as formal-legal (contributed to a comprehensive analysis of the conceptual zero project, the structure and content of the proposed mechanism of legal impact), structural analysis and synthesis (used to detect contradictions and cause-effect relationships), comparative-legal (contributed to the identification of negative trends of the World Health Organization pandemic agreement project being developed in relation to sovereignty and security of the Russian Federation), scientific and prognostic (provided an opportunity to assess the admissibility of the implementation of the project norms in Russian legislation). Conclusions are drawn that the draft of the World Health Organization “pandemic agreement” under consideration contradicts the sovereignty and security of the Russian Federation. The fundamental principles and conditions limit the sovereign right of the participating states to protect national security and the rights of citizens. The draft of the conceptual zero project of the World Health Organization pandemic agreement allows for its adoption without the express consent of the member states, including the Russian Federation, provided for by the constitutional procedure, on the basis of notification in a simple notification procedure.
Publisher
Tambov State University - G.R. Derzhavin
Reference10 articles.
1. 1. Degterev D.A. (2014). Decision-making mechanisms in international organizations and collective supranational bodies. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo = Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, no. 4, pp. 88-96. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/safcln
2. 2. Karkishchenko E.I. (2004). Normotvorcheskaya deyatel’nost’ Vsemirnoi оrganizatsii zdravookhraneniya [Rulemaking activities of the World Health Organization]. Moskovskii zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava = Moscow Journal of International Law, no. 1, pp. 76-84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2004-1-76-84, https://elibrary.ru/urwvby
3. 3. Lukashuk I.I. (2006). Sovremennoe pravo mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov: v 2 t. T. 2. Deistvie mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov [Modern Law of International Treaties: in 2 vols. Vol. 2. The Effect of International Treaties]. Moscow, WoltersKluwer Publ., 483 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qwbblx
4. 4. Malichenko V.S. (2021). Formirovanie mezhdunarodnogo prava zdravookhraneniya // Moskovskii zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava = Moscow Journal of International Law, no. 4, pp. 6-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2021-4-6-20, https://elibrary.ru/styrlc
5. 5. Mikhailov V.S. (1981). K voprosu o tak nazyvaemykh «neaktivnykh chlenakh» mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii (na primere chlenstva v VOZ) [On the issue of the so-called “inactive members” of international organizations (on the example of World Health Organization membership)]. Sovetskii ezhegodnik mezhdunarodnogo prava [Soviet Yearbook of International Law], vol. 1980, pp. 204-213. (In Russ.) Available at: https://rusneb.ru/catalog/000202_000006_837231/