Affiliation:
1. Saint-Petersburg University State Fire Service of the Ministry of the Russian Federation for Civil Defense, Emergencies and Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters named after the Hero of the Russian Federation, Army General E.N. Zinichev, Sapienza University of Rome
Abstract
We analyze the issues of legal regulation of jurisdiction of disputes types to arbitration in the BRICS states (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa). Evidently, an importance of the BRICS countries in modern international economy is objectively obvious, since they are major economic and political actors on the world stage. The Russian Federation plays an important role in this association. The institution of commercial arbitration or arbitration dispute proceedings is a historically recognized and effective way to resolve conflicts and protect the rights and interests of economic entities. The experience of the BRICS countries in regulating this institution seems interesting for research. A detailed and objective comparative analysis of the BRICS states legislation regulating arbitration sphere is carried out. The types of arbitrable and non-arbitrable disputes are identified. The main problems in the legal regulation of this area are identified, the main of which is a lack of clear and specific indications of disputes types that are subject to and not subject to arbitration. We suggest ways and means of solving the above problematic issues.
Publisher
Tambov State University - G.R. Derzhavin
Reference7 articles.
1. 1. Asadov B.R., Gavrilenko V.A., Nemchenko S.B. (2021). BRICS in international legal space: humanitarian imperatives of international security. BRICS Law Journal, no. 1, pp. 8-34. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2021-8-1-8-34, https://elibrary.ru/bkaddo
2. 2. Gavrilenko V.A. (2009). Deyatel’nost’ treteiskikh sudov v RF v period 90-kh godov [The activity of arbitration courts in the Russian Federation in the period of the 90s]. Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Pravovye problemy ukrepleniya rossiiskoi gosudarstvennosti» [Proceedings of All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference “Legal Problems of Strengthening Russian Statehood”]. Tomsk, Tomsk State University Publ., pp. 30-31. (In Russ.)
3. 3. Corrie C.A. (2013). International commercial arbitration in Brazil. Comparative Law Yearbook of International Business, vol. 35, pp. 113-158. Available at: https://vdocuments.site/international-commercial-arbitration-in-brazil.html?page=46 (accessed 31.10.2022)
4. 4. Kleandrov M.I. (2000). Treteiskie sudy po razresheniyu ekonomicheskikh sporov [Arbitration Courts for the Resolution of Economic Disputes]. Moscow, LLC Advertising and Production Company “NIK”, 64 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/yomwcp
5. 5. Belikova K.M., Akhmadova M.A. (2015). Formation and development of arbitrazh in the South African Republic. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess = Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure, no. 5, pp. 46-51. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/trikhx
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献