Abstract
This paper aims to detect the presence of political budget cycles (PBuCs) around presidential elections in four large Latin American countries (Argentina, Chile, Colombia, and Mexico) over the 1982-2014 period, in the framework of democratic regimes. Extended autoregressive models are estimated for total public expenditure and their chief components, considering the effect of economic fluctuations. Among the most important findings, weak evidence of PBuCs was found in the case of Argentina and Chile, while in the case of Mexico and Colombia, post-electoral adjustments in budget items sensitive to political manipulation were found, such as subsidies and public works, along with pre-electoral increases in total expenditure in the former one, and in goods and services in the latter.
Publisher
Editorial Universidad Catolica de Colombia
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance
Reference80 articles.
1. Aboal, D., Lorenzo, F., & Oddone G. (2001). The Political Economy of Budget Deficits in Uruguay. LACEA: Annual Conference, Montevideo.
2. Alesina, A. (1987). Macroeconomic policy in a two-party system as a repeated game. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102(3), 651-678.
3. Alesina, A. (1989). Politics and Business Cycles in Industrial Democracies. Economic Policy, 4(8), 57-98.
4. Alesina, A., & Sachs, J. (1988). Political parties and the business cycle in the United States, 1948-1984. Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 20(1), 63-82.
5. Barberia, L.G., & Avelino, G. (2011). Do Political Budget Cycles Differ in Latin American Democracies? Economía, 11(2), 101-134.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献